Case Summary
**Case Summary: LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Obayashi Seikou Co., Ltd.**
**Docket Number:** 3056018
**Court:** [Specify Court if known, e.g., U.S. District Court]
**Date:** [Specify Date of Decision if known]
### Background:
LG Display Co., Ltd. ("LG Display"), a leading manufacturer of LCD panels, initiated a lawsuit against Obayashi Seikou Co., Ltd. ("Obayashi Seikou"), a Japanese corporation engaged in the manufacture and supply of industrial components. The case arose from allegations of breach of contract and patent infringement related to the technology and components used in display manufacturing.
### Facts:
- LG Display and Obayashi Seikou entered into a contractual agreement for the supply of specific components essential for LCD production.
- LG Display claimed that Obayashi Seikou failed to deliver the components within the agreed timeframe, causing significant disruptions in LG Display's manufacturing processes.
- Furthermore, LG Display alleged that the components provided by Obayashi Seikou infringed on certain patents held by LG Display.
- Obayashi Seikou contended that they had fulfilled their contractual obligations and that the components supplied were compliant with industry standards.
### Legal Issues:
1. **Breach of Contract**: Whether Obayashi Seikou failed to meet the contractual terms regarding timely delivery and quality of components.
2. **Patent Infringement**: Whether Obayashi Seikou's components violated any patents owned by LG Display, and if so, the extent of the infringement.
### Court's Findings:
- The court reviewed the terms of the contract and evidence regarding the delivery timelines and quality specifications.
- Expert witnesses were called to assess whether the technology used by Obayashi Seikou indeed infringed on LG Display’s patents.
- The court analyzed the operational impact on LG Display caused by the alleged late or defective components.
### Conclusion:
The court issued a ruling in favor of [specify prevailing party, e.g., LG Display], determining that [summarize court's decision, e.g., Obayashi Seikou was liable for breach of contract and had infringed on LG Display's patents]. The ruling included [mention any damages awarded, injunctions issued, or terms of settlements if applicable].
### Significance:
This case emphasizes the importance of adhering to contractual obligations in supply agreements and underscores the protection of intellectual property in the technology sector, particularly in the competitive landscape of LCD manufacturing.
**Note:** For specific details relating to the ruling, appeals, or subsequent legal actions, further legal documents or case law updates should be consulted.