Case Summary
**Case Summary: LG Electronics, Inc. v. Conversant Wireless Licensing**
**Docket Number:** 8481136
**Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., United States District Court for the Northern District of California]
**Date Filed:** [Insert the date the case was filed]
**Key Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** LG Electronics, Inc.
- **Defendant:** Conversant Wireless Licensing
**Background:**
LG Electronics, Inc. (Plaintiff) is a leading global manufacturer of consumer electronics and appliances. Conversant Wireless Licensing (Defendant) is a technology firm specializing in wireless communication technologies and holds various patents related to these technologies.
The dispute centers around allegations of patent infringement. LG Electronics is accused of using certain wireless communication technologies without proper authorization, which are protected under patents held by Conversant Wireless Licensing. Conversant initiated the litigation to secure enforcement of its patent rights and to seek damages for the alleged infringement.
**Issues:**
1. Whether LG Electronics has infringed on the patents held by Conversant Wireless.
2. The validity and enforceability of the patents in question.
3. Potential damages owed to Conversant Wireless for any proven infringement.
4. Any defenses raised by LG Electronics, including invalidity claims or licensing agreements.
**Court Proceedings:**
The case has undergone pre-trial motions, including motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment. Both parties have engaged in discovery to gather pertinent evidence regarding the technology involved and the extent of the alleged infringement.
**Outcome:**
As of the last available updates or court ruling, the case is ongoing, with future hearings scheduled to determine the merits of the claims and defenses presented by both parties. The resolution may involve a ruling on the infringement allegations, potential settlement discussions, or upcoming trials.
**Significance:**
This case highlights ongoing tensions in the technology industry over intellectual property rights, particularly in the competitive field of wireless technologies. The outcome could have implications for licensing practices and the enforcement of patent rights in the consumer electronics sector.
**Next Steps:**
The court will continue to review the evidence presented, with potential rulings expected in the coming months. Both parties remain engaged in negotiations that could lead to an out-of-court settlement.
(Note: Specific dates, court levels, and details may need to be added based on the most current legal filings and any subsequent developments in the case since the last update.)