Case Summary
**Case Summary: Lincoln Provisions v. Philip Wolfstein, Docket No. 2604913**
**Court:** [Specify Court]
**Date:** [Specify Date]
**Parties:**
- Plaintiff: Lincoln Provisions
- Defendant: Philip Wolfstein
**Overview:**
Lincoln Provisions filed a lawsuit against Philip Wolfstein concerning a dispute over contractual obligations, payments, and the delivery of goods as stipulated in their agreement.
**Background:**
The parties entered into a contract where Lincoln Provisions was to supply specific food products to Wolfstein’s business within agreed-upon timelines and payment terms. Disputes arose regarding the quality and timeliness of the deliveries, as well as the payments made by Wolfstein.
**Legal Issues:**
1. Whether Lincoln Provisions fulfilled their contractual obligations regarding the quality and delivery timelines.
2. Whether Wolfstein made the payments as agreed in the contract.
3. Determination of any damages owed to either party for breach of contract.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:** Lincoln Provisions contended that they adhered to the terms of the contract and provided high-quality products on time. They asserted that any complaints from Wolfstein regarding the delivered products were unfounded and that the payment delays constituted a breach of contract by Wolfstein.
- **Defendant's Argument:** Philip Wolfstein argued that the products delivered were substandard and did not meet the specifications outlined in their agreement, justifying his withholding of payment. Wolfstein claimed that the repeated failures to meet delivery schedules and product quality led to losses for his business.
**Court Findings:**
The court examined evidence including the contract terms, delivery records, correspondence between the parties, and testimonies. Key findings included:
- Determination of whether Lincoln Provisions delivered products that met the contractual standards.
- Evaluation of payment history and whether Wolfstein legally withheld payments based on breach of contract claims.
- Assessment of damages incurred by either party due to the alleged breach.
**Conclusion:**
The court issued a ruling on the matter, deciding in favor of one party based on the evidence and legal standards applicable to contract law.
**Judgment:** [Summarize the judgment, including any damages awarded and any obligations imposed on either party.]
---
Note: Specific details such as the date of the judgment, the court, and the detailed outcome (i.e., who won and the damages) would need to be provided based on actual case records.