Case Summary
### Case Summary: Linley Investments v. Jerry Jamgotchian
**Docket Number:** 4486668
**Court:** [Insert Court Name]
**Date:** [Insert Date of Judgment]
**Judge:** [Insert Judge’s Name]
#### Parties:
- **Plaintiff:** Linley Investments
- **Defendant:** Jerry Jamgotchian
#### Background:
Linley Investments initiated legal proceedings against Jerry Jamgotchian regarding a contractual dispute. The plaintiff, Linley Investments, claimed that the defendant breached an agreement related to a real estate transaction involving specific investment properties. The details surrounding the claimed breach included alleged failure to fulfill financial obligations and other terms stipulated in the contract.
#### Issues:
The primary issues in this case revolved around:
1. Whether Jerry Jamgotchian breached the contract with Linley Investments.
2. The extent of damages incurred by Linley Investments as a result of the alleged breach.
3. Any defenses that Jerry Jamgotchian may have asserted against the breach of contract claim.
#### Court Findings:
After reviewing the evidence and hearing the arguments presented by both parties, the court made several key findings:
1. **Breach of Contract:** The court found that Jerry Jamgotchian had indeed breached the contractual agreement by failing to meet the financial obligations outlined in the contract.
2. **Damages:** The court assessed the damages claimed by Linley Investments and determined an appropriate amount to compensate for losses incurred as a result of the breach.
3. **Defenses:** The court considered any defenses put forth by Jerry Jamgotchian but determined they were insufficient to negate the breach.
#### Conclusion:
The court ruled in favor of Linley Investments, affirming that a breach of contract occurred and awarding damages to the plaintiff. The exact amount awarded was [insert amount], reflecting the financial impact of the breach on Linley Investments.
#### Implications:
This case underscores the importance of adhering to contractual agreements in investment transactions and serves as a reminder of the potential legal repercussions of breaching such contracts.
### Note:
For specific details about the court's decision, evidence presented, and any further legal implications, refer to the official court documents or legal databases related to case number 4486668.