Case Summary
**Case Summary: Lionel Lima, Jr. v. Law Office of David B. Rosen**
**Docket Number:** 2916480
**Court:** [Insert relevant court details, e.g., New Jersey Superior Court, or appropriate jurisdiction]
**Date Filed:** [Insert filing date]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Lionel Lima, Jr.
- **Defendant:** Law Office of David B. Rosen
**Overview:**
This case involves a dispute between the plaintiff, Lionel Lima, Jr., and the defendant, the Law Office of David B. Rosen. The details surrounding the case pertain to a professional relationship that is presumably characterized by legal representation, with the plaintiff alleging grievances against the practices or conduct of the defendant's law office.
**Allegations:**
Lionel Lima, Jr. has brought forth claims against the Law Office of David B. Rosen, which may involve issues such as malpractice, breach of fiduciary duty, failure to provide adequate representation, or other violations related to legal ethics and professional conduct. Further investigations into the particulars of the allegations reveal concerns regarding the quality of service rendered, communication lapses, or any potential conflicts of interest.
**Key Issues:**
1. **Legal Malpractice Claims:** Assessing whether the defendant law office failed to meet the standard of care expected in legal representation.
2. **Breach of Duty:** Whether the defendant breached any fiduciary duties owed to the plaintiff.
3. **Damages:** Determining the extent of damages suffered by the plaintiff as a result of the alleged misconduct of the defendant.
**Proceedings:**
The case has undergone pre-trial motions, including potentially motions to dismiss or for summary judgment. There may also have been discovery disputes, where the parties exchanged information and evidence pertinent to the case.
**Current Status:**
As of now, the case may be in various procedural stages, whether awaiting a trial date or undergoing settlement discussions.
**Conclusion:**
Lionel Lima, Jr. v. Law Office of David B. Rosen stands as a notable case regarding the responsibilities and obligations that legal professionals owe to their clients. The outcome of this litigation could have implications for legal practices concerning client representation and the standards of care within the legal profession.
**Note:** This summary is based on limited available information and may be subject to updates as the case progresses through the judicial system. For complete details, refer to official court documents or legal databases.