Legal Case Summary

Lolita Schagene v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.


Date Argued: Mon Apr 03 2017
Case Number: 15-56863
Docket Number: 4668468
Judges:Wardlaw, Callahan, Kendall
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Lolita Schagene v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.** **Docket Number:** 4668468 **Court:** [Insert appropriate court name, e.g., United States District Court] **Date:** [Insert the date of the decision or filing] **Overview:** The case of Lolita Schagene v. Raymond Mabus, Jr. involves a legal dispute between the plaintiff, Lolita Schagene, and the defendant, Raymond Mabus, Jr. The particulars of the case focus on [insert key issues, e.g., a breach of contract, employment dispute, or other specific legal matter]. **Facts:** 1. **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Lolita Schagene - **Defendant:** Raymond Mabus, Jr. 2. **Background:** - [Briefly describe the background context – what led to the dispute. Include relevant dates, actions taken by parties, and any pertinent contracts or agreements that were in place.] 3. **Claim:** - Schagene alleges that Mabus [insert specific claims, e.g., failed to fulfill contractual obligations, engaged in discriminatory behavior, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The case raises several legal questions, including: - Whether Mabus fulfilled his obligations under the relevant [contract/law]. - The applicability of [insert relevant statutes or legal precedents that may apply]. **Court's Analysis:** - The court considered [briefly outline the court's reasoning, legal standards applied, and relevant case law]. - The discussion centered on [insert important factors the court took into account, such as evidence presented, witness testimony, or legal precedents]. **Decision:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [insert which party or parties the court favored, along with a brief rationale for the decision]. The ruling included [mention any orders, damages awarded, or injunctions granted]. **Conclusion:** The case of Lolita Schagene v. Raymond Mabus, Jr. highlights [insert key takeaways from the case regarding legal principles, implications for the parties involved, or broader context for similar cases]. [If applicable, mention any potential for appeal or future proceedings linked to the case.] **Note:** Further details regarding the ruling or any subsequent appeals may be outlined in further court documentation or opinions. **[End of Summary]** *Please note that since I don't have access to specific court documents, the above summary is a template and should be filled in with precise details relevant to the particular case.*

Lolita Schagene v. Raymond Mabus, Jr.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available