Case Summary
**Case Summary: Loncarevic & Assoc. v. Stanley Foam Corp.**
**Docket Number:** 3082564
**Court:** [Specify the Court Name, e.g., Circuit Court of [Jurisdiction]]
**Date:** [Specify Date of Decision]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Loncarevic & Associates
- **Defendant:** Stanley Foam Corporation
**Facts:**
Loncarevic & Associates, a company specializing in [describe the business, e.g., interior design, construction, etc.], filed a lawsuit against Stanley Foam Corporation, a manufacturer of foam products. The dispute arose when Loncarevic & Associates alleged that Stanley Foam Corp. failed to fulfill contractual obligations related to the supply of foam materials required for their projects. The plaintiff claimed that the quality of the products delivered was substandard and not in compliance with the contractual specifications, which led to financial losses and project delays.
**Issues:**
1. Whether Stanley Foam Corporation breached the contract by delivering products that did not meet the agreed specifications.
2. Whether Loncarevic & Associates incurred damages as a direct result of the alleged breach by Stanley Foam Corporation.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Argument:**
Loncarevic & Associates argued that the discrepancies in product quality constituted a breach of contract, causing significant financial losses and project delays. They presented evidence including inspection reports, correspondence with Stanley Foam, and expert testimony regarding the industry standards for foam products.
- **Defendant's Argument:**
Stanley Foam Corporation contended that they adhered to the contract terms and that any perceived issues were due to the installation methods or handling by Loncarevic & Associates. They also argued that the damages claimed were exaggerated and not directly attributable to their products.
**Ruling:**
The court found in favor of [plaintiff/defendant], determining that [summarize the court's decision, including any findings related to breach of contract and damages]. The court emphasized [any relevant legal principles, precedents, or considerations].
**Conclusion:**
The ruling concluded with [details on any judgments made, including damages awarded, specific performance required, or any injunctions]. This case highlights the importance of [any key takeaways for contract law, business practices, etc.].
**Implications:**
The decision in Loncarevic & Associates v. Stanley Foam Corp. serves as a precedent for future contractual disputes in the manufacturing and supply industry, particularly regarding the quality and compliance of product deliveries. It reinforces the necessity for clear specifications in contracts and the importance of thorough documentation in business transactions.
---
Please note that specific details such as court name, date of decision, and nuanced arguments would require access to the case file or court records to complete accurately.