Case Summary
**Case Summary: Lonnie Gilliland v. Charles County Board of Education**
**Docket Number:** 2601019
**Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Circuit Court for Charles County]
**Date:** [Insert Date]
**Overview:**
This case involves Lonnie Gilliland, the appellant, challenging the decision made by the Charles County Board of Education, the appellee. The dispute arises from employment-related issues, with Gilliland asserting grievances concerning his employment status, treatment, or decisions made by the Board.
**Facts:**
- Lonnie Gilliland was employed by the Charles County Board of Education.
- [Insert specific details regarding the nature of Gilliland's employment, such as his role, duration of service, etc.]
- The Board made decisions/actions that Gilliland claims negatively affected his employment.
- Gilliland alleges violations of employment rights, seeking redress through the legal system.
**Legal Issues:**
- The primary legal issues at stake include [list any relevant legal statutes, employment law rights, or regulations that are pertinent to the case].
- The appellant contends that the Board's actions were unlawful and detrimental to his career and professional reputation.
**Arguments:**
- **Appellant's Arguments (Gilliland):**
- [Detail the arguments posited by Gilliland, such as wrongful termination, discrimination, failure to provide due process, etc.]
- Gilliland seeks [state the relief or remedy sought, such as reinstatement, damages, etc.].
- **Appellee's Arguments (Board of Education):**
- The Charles County Board of Education defends its actions, asserting [summarize the Board's main defenses and justifications for its decisions].
- The Board may argue compliance with relevant policies and procedures.
**Procedural Posture:**
- The case has progressed through the initial administrative hearings [or whichever relevant procedural steps].
- After thorough examination, decisions have been made at lower levels which Gilliland is now appealing.
**Conclusion:**
The outcome of Lonnie Gilliland v. Charles County Board of Education will hinge on interpretations of employment law and the specific factual circumstances surrounding Gilliland’s employment and the Board’s actions. The case underscores critical issues of employee rights within educational institutions and sets a precedent for similar disputes in the future.
(Note: Specific information regarding dates, court details, and further factual or legal particulars should be filled in based on the actual case records and documents.)