Case Summary
**Case Summary: Lonny Acker v. General Motors, L.L.C.**
**Docket Number**: 4614244
**Court**: [Specify the court if known, e.g., District Court, Circuit Court]
**Filed**: [Insert filing date if available]
**Case Type**: Civil / Personal Injury / Product Liability
**Parties Involved**:
- **Plaintiff**: Lonny Acker
- **Defendant**: General Motors, L.L.C.
**Background**:
Lonny Acker initiated a lawsuit against General Motors, L.L.C. asserting claims related to product liabilities. The plaintiff alleges that a defect in one of General Motors' vehicles led to an accident causing personal injuries. The specifics of the vehicle involved, the nature of the alleged defect, and the circumstances surrounding the accident are pivotal elements in the case.
**Allegations**:
The complaint outlines that:
1. General Motors failed to adequately design, manufacture, or inspect the vehicle, leading to inherent safety risks.
2. The defect directly contributed to Acker’s injuries sustained in the incident.
3. Acker seeks damages for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering resulting from the accident.
**Defendant’s Position**:
General Motors, L.L.C. has likely filed an answer to the complaint denying the allegations. The defense may argue that:
1. The vehicle was not defective, or if it was, that the defect did not cause the accident.
2. The plaintiff may have contributed to the accident through negligence or misuse of the vehicle.
3. Any injuries sustained were not solely due to the alleged defect but may have other contributing factors.
**Procedural History**:
- The case has proceeded through pre-trial motions including discovery where both parties exchanged evidence and crafted arguments to support their positions.
- Expert witnesses may be involved to discuss vehicle safety standards and the specific condition of the vehicle at the time of the incident.
**Issues**:
The key legal issues to be resolved in this case will include:
1. Whether the vehicle in question had a design or manufacturing defect.
2. If that defect was a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injuries.
3. Assessment of damages and liability.
**Current Status**:
As of the latest update, the case is [insert current status, e.g., awaiting trial, mediation, or settlement discussions].
**Conclusion**:
The outcome of Lonny Acker v. General Motors, L.L.C. will hinge on the determination of the vehicle's condition, the existence of a defect, and the causal relationship between that defect and the injuries sustained by the plaintiff. Depending on the findings, this case could set precedent regarding product liability and automotive safety standards.
---
(Note: The above summary is a generalized representation. Specific details and outcomes would require access to case documents or updates.)