Legal Case Summary

Loraine Campbell v. State of Washington Department


Date Argued: Fri Nov 05 2010
Case Number: 09-35892
Docket Number: 7846702
Judges:Wilken, Fletcher B. , Bybee
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Loraine Campbell v. State of Washington Department** **Docket Number: 7846702** **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Washington Court of Appeals] **Date:** [Specify the decision date if known] **Judges:** [List judges if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Appellant:** Loraine Campbell - **Respondent:** State of Washington Department [specific department if applicable] **Background:** Loraine Campbell filed an appeal against the State of Washington Department regarding [brief description of the issue, e.g., employment termination, benefits denial, etc.]. The case originated from [briefly outline the circumstances leading to the case, e.g., actions taken by the department, notices received by the appellant, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The principal legal issues in this case included: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., whether the department followed due process in its decision-making]. 2. [Issue 2: e.g., whether Campbell’s rights were violated under applicable state or federal laws]. **Arguments:** - **Appellant’s Argument:** Loraine Campbell contended that [summarize her main arguments, including any statutory or constitutional rights she claimed were violated, evidence she provided, etc.]. - **Respondent’s Argument:** The State of Washington Department defended its actions by asserting that [summarize the department's rationale, including any legal justifications, compliance with regulations, etc.]. **Decision:** The court ruled [summarize the court's ruling, whether it upheld the decision made by the department, reversed it, or remanded it for further proceedings]. The court's opinion stated that [include any key points from the opinion, such as legal principles applied, precedents cited, and the rationale for the decision]. **Conclusion:** The case of Loraine Campbell v. State of Washington Department highlighted significant issues regarding [mention any broader implications or important aspects of the ruling]. The decision reinforced [discuss any legal precedents, interpretations of law, or policy implications that resulted from the case]. [Additional notes, if needed: Attach any relevant information regarding subsequent appeals, impacts on policy or law, etc.] **End of Summary** (Note: This is a generic template. Specific details about the case would need to be filled in based on the actual content of the court case for accuracy.)

Loraine Campbell v. State of Washington Department


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available