Legal Case Summary

Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.


Date Argued: Wed Mar 04 2015
Case Number: W2014-00504-CCA-R3-CD
Docket Number: 2639297
Judges:Fisher, Paez, Ikuta
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 2639297 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., District Court of [State/Circuit]] **Filing Date:** [Specify Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Loredana Ranza - **Defendant:** Nike, Inc. **Background:** Loredana Ranza filed a lawsuit against Nike, Inc., alleging [specific claims, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, product liability, discrimination, etc.]. The case stems from an incident that occurred on [date of incident], where Ranza asserts that [briefly describe the incident, e.g., she was injured due to a defective product, experienced discrimination at a store, etc.]. **Allegations:** The plaintiff claims that Nike, Inc. was responsible for [details of the alleged wrongdoing, including how it affected Ranza]. Ranza argues that as a result of Nike's actions or inactions, she suffered [describe the harm or damages incurred, such as physical injuries, emotional distress, financial loss, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** - Whether Nike, Inc. can be held liable for [the specific claims made]. - The applicability of any defenses raised by Nike, Inc., such as [statute of limitations, assumption of risk, etc.]. - Determination of damages and potential remedies for the plaintiff. **Defendant’s Response:** Nike, Inc. has denied the allegations, stating that [briefly outline Nike's defense, such as lack of liability, compliance with industry standards, etc.]. The company may argue that [any potential defenses or counterclaims]. **Current Status:** As of [latest date], the case is [in what stage the case is currently, e.g., pending motion to dismiss, in settlement negotiations, scheduled for trial, etc.]. [Any relevant upcoming dates or decisions from the court]. **Conclusion:** The case of Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc. raises significant questions regarding [the legal implications of the case, such as corporate responsibility, consumer safety, employee rights, etc.]. The outcome may have broader implications for [related legal areas, industry practices, etc.]. **Notes:** - Further developments will be monitored as the case progresses through the legal system. - [Any additional information or nuances that might be pertinent to understanding the case.] **[End of Summary]** *Please note that the above summary is a fictional outline created based on common legal case structures. Specific details such as allegations, defenses, and current status would need to be accurately populated from actual case documents.*

Loredana Ranza v. Nike, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available