Legal Case Summary

Lorenzo Oliver v. City of Anaheim


Date Argued: Fri Jul 13 2012
Case Number: 11-55492
Docket Number: 7839079
Judges:Kozinski, Reinhardt, Watford
Duration: 37 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Lorenzo Oliver v. City of Anaheim** **Docket Number:** 7839079 **Court:** [Appropriate Court Name, e.g., Superior Court of California] **Filing Date:** [Insert Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Lorenzo Oliver - **Defendant:** City of Anaheim **Background:** Lorenzo Oliver initiated legal action against the City of Anaheim concerning [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., a personal injury, wrongful termination, civil rights violation, etc.]. The case arises from an incident that occurred on [insert date of incident], where Oliver claims [insert key details about the claims being made by the plaintiff, e.g., negligence, improper conduct by city officials, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The primary issues in this case include: 1. [Insert specific legal issues raised, such as liability, damages, compliance with local/state laws, etc.] 2. [Mention any defenses raised by the City of Anaheim] **Facts of the Case:** - On [insert date], Oliver alleges that [describe the events that led to the lawsuit]. - [Include any relevant facts that support the plaintiff’s claims and any pertinent details that the defendant may argue]. **Rulings and Proceedings:** - Initial motions were filed by both parties regarding [insert any pre-trial motions, motions to dismiss, etc.]. - [Mention any hearings, rulings by the court, and important judicial decisions that occurred during the proceedings]. **Outcome:** - [If the case has been resolved, indicate the outcomes such as jury verdict, settlement, etc.] - [If still ongoing, state the current status of the case, any upcoming court dates, and anticipated next steps.] **Significance:** This case is significant as it raises important questions regarding [insert broader implications, such as municipal liability, civil rights, etc.], thereby impacting how similar cases may be adjudicated in the future. **Next Steps:** - [Indicate any pending motions, discovery phases, or trial dates.] **Conclusion:** The outcome of Lorenzo Oliver v. City of Anaheim will be closely monitored as it may have implications for municipal operations and the rights of individuals in similar situations. Further developments in the case will be necessary to fully understand its resolution and impact. (Note: Please insert relevant dates, specific details of the claims, and factual information as necessary for a comprehensive case summary.)

Lorenzo Oliver v. City of Anaheim


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available