Legal Case Summary

Loretta Avent v. Tempe Union High School Distri


Date Argued: Thu Nov 05 2009
Case Number: 08-16419
Docket Number: 7848684
Judges:Mills, Goodwin, Tallman
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Loretta Avent v. Tempe Union High School District** **Docket Number:** 7848684 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Maricopa County Superior Court] **Filing Date:** [Specify the date of filing if available] **Outcome:** [Specify the outcome if available] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Loretta Avent - **Defendant:** Tempe Union High School District **Background:** Loretta Avent filed a lawsuit against the Tempe Union High School District, asserting claims related to [provide general information about the nature of the claims, e.g., employment disputes, discrimination, wrongful termination, etc.]. The plaintiff alleged that the actions of the school district led to [summarize the plaintiff's allegations and the basis of the case]. **Legal Issues:** The key legal issues in the case revolved around: - [Specify legal issues such as employment law violations, discrimination statutes, etc.] - [Mention any relevant state or federal laws that may apply] **Facts:** - Loretta Avent was employed by the Tempe Union High School District in the capacity of [specify position, e.g., teacher, administrator]. - Incidents occurred that led to the claims, including [summarize any key facts relevant to the case, e.g., dates of incidents, actions taken by the school district, and responses by Avent]. - The plaintiff sought remedy for [specify any damages, reinstatement, or other forms of relief pursued in the lawsuit]. **Proceedings:** The case proceeded through [mention any pre-trial motions, hearings, and other relevant proceedings, e.g., deposition, discovery disputes]. The defendant filed [any motions such as a motion to dismiss or summary judgment] in response to the claims made by the plaintiff. **Outcome:** [If there is a ruling or settlement, summarize the outcome; if still pending, mention that the case is ongoing.] **Significance:** This case highlights important issues regarding [speculate on broader implications for employment law, school policy, employee rights, and litigation in the education sector]. **Conclusion:** The litigation between Loretta Avent and the Tempe Union High School District underscores the complex nature of employment disputes within educational institutions and the legal avenues available to address potential grievances. **Note:** Specific details such as dates, motions, and final rulings should be filled in once verified from reliable legal sources or court documents.

Loretta Avent v. Tempe Union High School Distri


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available