Legal Case Summary

Loretta Johnson v. City of Unalakleet


Date Argued: Mon Jun 25 2012
Case Number: 11-35054
Docket Number: 7839154
Judges:Goodwin, Fletcher, Smith
Duration: 31 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Loretta Johnson v. City of Unalakleet** **Docket Number:** 7839154 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., Alaska Superior Court] **Date:** [Enter pertinent dates, e.g., filing date, any notable hearing dates] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Loretta Johnson - **Defendant:** City of Unalakleet **Background:** Loretta Johnson filed a lawsuit against the City of Unalakleet, alleging [insert the main allegations, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, personal injury, etc.]. The plaintiff asserts that [provide essential details about the plaintiff's claims and underlying facts that led to the lawsuit, e.g., incidents, actions by the city, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case revolve around: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., whether the City acted within its rights under local or state law] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., whether the plaintiff was subjected to discriminatory practices] 3. [Any other relevant legal issues that could be central to the case] **Plaintiff's Arguments:** Loretta Johnson contends that [summarize the plaintiff's main arguments, including specific claims related to damages, violations of rights, or breaches of duty by the City of Unalakleet]. The plaintiff seeks [detail the remedies or relief sought, such as compensation, reinstatement, punitive damages, etc.]. **Defendant's Response:** The City of Unalakleet denies the allegations and argues that [summarize the defendant's position, defenses, or motions filed, such as a motion to dismiss or a motion for summary judgment, if applicable]. The City maintains that [explain any legal grounds the City cites to justify its actions or to refute the plaintiff's claims]. **Current Status:** As of [insert current date or relevant date], the case is [describe the status of the case, e.g., pending, awaiting trial, settled, etc.]. Describe any upcoming hearings or procedural steps that are scheduled, if known. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Loretta Johnson v. City of Unalakleet remains to be determined. This case underscores the ongoing legal discourse surrounding [mention any broader legal implications or subjects relevant to the case, such as municipal liability, employment law, civil rights, etc.]. [If applicable, include any notable citations or references to similar cases or statutes that might influence the outcome of this case.] **Note:** This summary is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal concerns or inquiries about this case, please consult with a licensed attorney. [End of summary]

Loretta Johnson v. City of Unalakleet


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available