Case Summary
**Case Summary: Lorraine Ferguson v. Horizon Lines**
**Docket Number:** 2634145
**Court:** [Insert Court Name Here]
**Date:** [Insert Date of Ruling]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Lorraine Ferguson
- **Defendant:** Horizon Lines
**Background:**
Lorraine Ferguson filed a lawsuit against Horizon Lines, alleging claims related to [insert specific claims, e.g., negligence, breach of contract, wrongful termination]. The case arose from incidents that occurred on or about [insert relevant dates], where Ferguson contended that her rights were violated during her employment with Horizon Lines.
**Facts:**
- Lorraine Ferguson worked for Horizon Lines in the capacity of [insert job title or role].
- Ferguson claimed that [describe the specific events or actions taken by Horizon Lines that led to the lawsuit, e.g., discriminatory practices, unsafe working conditions, etc.].
- Horizon Lines responded to the allegations, asserting that [summarize the defense's position or any affirmative defenses raised, e.g., that the claims are unfounded or lack merit].
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal issues in this case involve:
1. Whether Horizon Lines breached any employment agreements or violated labor laws.
2. The extent of damages Ferguson incurred due to the alleged actions of Horizon Lines.
3. Any applicable defenses or justifications presented by Horizon Lines in response to the claims.
**Court's Decision:**
The court [state the outcome, e.g., ruled in favor of Ferguson, granted partial summary judgment, etc.], finding that [summarize the rationale behind the court's decision]. The court emphasized [highlight any significant legal principles or precedents cited in the ruling].
**Damages Awarded:**
The court awarded Lorraine Ferguson [insert amount, if applicable] for [specify the basis of the award, such as lost wages, emotional distress, punitive damages, etc.].
**Conclusion:**
The case of Lorraine Ferguson v. Horizon Lines underscores important issues related to [insert relevant topics, such as employee rights, workplace safety, or contract enforcement]. The ruling sets a precedent that may influence future cases involving similar claims in the maritime or transportation industry.
**Notes:**
- Further appeals may be considered by Horizon Lines as indicated in their post-decision statements.
- The case highlights the ongoing legal battles faced by employees in asserting their rights against larger corporations.
[Additional specific details, such as dates, court quotes, and implications of the ruling, should be included where available to provide more context and depth to the case summary.]