Legal Case Summary

Lourdes Archbold-Garrett v. New Orleans Cit


Date Argued: Thu May 03 2018
Case Number: 17-30692
Docket Number: 6385123
Judges:Not available
Duration: 35 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Lourdes Archbold-Garrett v. New Orleans City, Docket Number 6385123** **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., District Court, Court of Appeals] **Date:** [Insert date of the decision] **Judges:** [List the judges involved, if applicable] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Lourdes Archbold-Garrett - **Defendant:** City of New Orleans **Background:** Lourdes Archbold-Garrett filed a suit against the City of New Orleans regarding [briefly summarize the nature of the dispute, such as personal injury, wrongful termination, violation of rights, etc.]. The plaintiff alleged that [detail the key allegations or claims made by the plaintiff]. **Facts:** - On [insert relevant dates], Archbold-Garrett encountered [describe the incident or situation that led to the lawsuit]. - The plaintiff asserts that [provide further details on the events, actions taken by the city, and any relevant circumstances surrounding the case]. - The defendant (City of New Orleans) has [detail any defenses or counterclaims raised by the city]. **Legal Issues:** The case raised several legal issues, including: 1. [List the primary legal issue(s), e.g., liability of the city, whether appropriate procedures were followed, etc.] 2. [Another legal issue, if applicable.] **Court's Analysis:** The court reviewed the evidence presented by both parties, including [mention any key evidence, testimonies, or expert opinions]. The court analyzed [summarize the legal principles or precedents applied in the case]. **Decision:** The court ruled in favor of [indicate whether the plaintiff or the defendant won], stating that [summarize the court's reasoning and final judgment, including any damages awarded or orders given]. **Conclusion:** The decision in Lourdes Archbold-Garrett v. New Orleans City emphasizes [discuss the implications of the ruling, any changes it might spur in law or city policy, and its overall impact on similar cases]. The case serves as a significant precedent for [identify relevant areas of law]. **Further Actions:** Following the ruling, [indicate whether any appeals were filed or if the case is considered final]. --- Please ensure that you verify all details and fill in any missing information specific to the case.

Lourdes Archbold-Garrett v. New Orleans Cit


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available