Legal Case Summary

Lowery v. Schriro


Date Argued: Fri Oct 20 2006
Case Number: 05-17377
Docket Number: 7855750
Judges:Beezer, O'scannlain, Trott
Duration: 22 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Lowery v. Schriro** **Docket Number:** 7855750 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., United States District Court for the District of Arizona] **Date:** [Insert date of decision or filing, if known] **Overview:** Lowery v. Schriro involves a legal dispute where the petitioner, Lowery, challenged actions taken by Schriro, presumably in a position of authority, potentially involving the administration of prison regulations, civil rights issues, or other administrative matters concerning Lowery’s treatment or conditions of confinement. **Background:** The specifics of the background leading to the case are critical. Generally, Lowery may have alleged violations of constitutional rights, improper administrative procedures, or other claims associated with civil liberties within the corrections system. **Key Issues:** - **Violation of Rights:** The case may center on allegations of wrongful treatment, inadequate medical care, or failure to provide safe conditions while incarcerated. - **Due Process:** High likelihood of arguments surrounding due process rights in the context of administrative actions taken against Lowery. - **Administrative Decisions:** The legality and appropriateness of decisions made by Schriro regarding Lowery's confinement conditions or treatment. **Arguments:** - **For Lowery:** Likely argues that Schriro's actions constituted a violation of statutory or constitutional rights. - **For Schriro:** Might argue that actions taken were within the bounds of authority, justifying decisions under applicable standards or regulations. **Outcomes:** A summary of the court's ruling, including whether the court affirmed, reversed, or remanded any decisions related to the case. Any recommendations for administrative changes or findings regarding constitutional compliance could also be included. **Significance:** The case could set a precedent regarding inmate rights and the extent of authority exercised by prison officials, influencing future interpretations and applications of law in the context of corrections. **Conclusion:** The Lowery v. Schriro case reflects ongoing tensions between inmate rights and institutional authority within the prison system. The resolution of this case is pertinent for future cases involving similar issues, emphasizing the importance of protecting individual rights while balancing security and administrative needs. (Note: Specific details about the factual background, court holdings, and outcomes are necessary for a comprehensive case summary. This summary serves as a template and should be supplemented with actual case details from the court records.)

Lowery v. Schriro


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available