Legal Case Summary

Lutterschmidt v. Danz


Date Argued: Tue Feb 04 2014
Case Number: 4-13-0356
Docket Number: 3087638
Judges:Not available
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Lutterschmidt v. Danz, Docket No. 3087638** **Court:** [Specify the Court] **Date:** [Specify Date] **Judge:** [Specify Judge] **Parties:** - **Appellant/Plaintiff:** Lutterschmidt - **Appellee/Defendant:** Danz **Overview:** Lutterschmidt v. Danz revolves around a legal dispute involving [briefly describe the nature of the case, e.g., contract issues, property disputes, personal injury claims, etc.]. The case was filed in [court name] under docket number 3087638. **Facts:** The pivotal facts of the case include: - [Briefly summarize key facts, e.g., events leading to the lawsuit, prior agreements, actions taken by both parties, etc.] - [Include any common practices relevant to the case or industry standards that might influence the court's opinion.] **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. [First legal issue, e.g., whether there was a breach of contract or negligence.] 2. [Second legal issue, if applicable.] 3. [Any additional issues.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Lutterschmidt argues that [summarize the plaintiff's position and legal reasoning]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Danz contends that [summarize the defendant's position and legal reasoning]. **Ruling:** The court [describe the court's decision, e.g., upheld the lower court's ruling, dismissed the case, awarded damages, etc.]. **Outcome:** - [Summarize any damages awarded, injunctions issued, or other significant consequences resulting from the ruling.] - [Mention if there are any implications for future cases or legal standards.] **Conclusion:** The case of Lutterschmidt v. Danz emphasizes [discuss any broader legal principles or societal implications emerging from the case]. The court's decision reflects [briefly comment on the significance of the ruling]. **Note:** For more specific details, such as the court’s reasoning or quoted statutes, legal experts or parties involved may refer to official court documentation or legal databases.

Lutterschmidt v. Danz


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available