Legal Case Summary

M.S. v. Lake Elsinore Unif. Sch. Dist.


Date Argued: Mon Feb 06 2017
Case Number: 15-56283
Docket Number: 4582554
Judges:Kleinfeld, Ikuta, Nguyen
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: M.S. v. Lake Elsinore Unified School District** **Docket Number:** 4582554 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court of California, Riverside County] **Filing Date:** [Insert Date] **Judges:** [Name of Judges if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** M.S. (Minor, represented by guardians) - **Defendant:** Lake Elsinore Unified School District **Background:** The case involves M.S., a minor student, and the Lake Elsinore Unified School District regarding issues related to educational services, accommodations, and possibly the denial of appropriate special education resources as mandated under applicable laws, potentially including the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). **Facts:** - M.S. is a student who reportedly suffers from specific disabilities that have impacted their educational experience. - The plaintiff alleges that the school district failed to provide necessary support and accommodations that are essential for M.S.’s educational success and overall well-being. - Specific instances of alleged negligence or failure to act by school officials may have taken place, along with an assertion that the school district did not comply with required legal obligations to support students with disabilities. **Issues:** - Whether the Lake Elsinore Unified School District failed to provide a free appropriate public education (FAPE) to M.S. as required by law. - Whether the district adequately evaluated M.S.’s educational needs and provided the necessary services and resources. - Potential violations of state and federal laws governing special education services. **Legal Framework:** This case may invoke provisions under the IDEA, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and state education codes concerning the rights of students with disabilities. **Outcome:** [If available, detail any court rulings, orders, or agreements made regarding the case, such as compensatory education, policy changes within the school district, or financial reparations for the plaintiff.] **Significance:** This case underscores the ongoing challenges within educational systems in meeting the needs of students requiring special education and ensures adherence to legal standards established for the protection of these students’ rights. (Note: The above case summary is fictional and created in response to your request, as the actual details of the case M.S. v. Lake Elsinore Unified School District are not provided. Please insert specific dates, judicial details, and outcomes if known.)

M.S. v. Lake Elsinore Unif. Sch. Dist.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available