Case Summary
**Case Summary: Mamikon Karapetian v. Kia Motors America, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 7837803
**Court:** [Insert relevant court name, if known]
**Date:** [Insert date of the judgment, if known]
**Overview:**
Mamikon Karapetian filed a lawsuit against Kia Motors America, Inc., alleging claims related to defects in a vehicle purchased from the company. The case revolves around issues of warranty, product liability, and potential violations of consumer protection laws.
**Facts:**
- The plaintiff, Mamikon Karapetian, purchased a vehicle from Kia Motors America, Inc.
- After the purchase, the vehicle exhibited significant defects that the plaintiff contends were present at the time of sale.
- The plaintiff alleges that Kia Motors failed to address these defects adequately despite repeated requests for repairs.
- Specific claims include breach of warranty, as well as allegations that the company failed to honor its obligations under the warranty agreement.
**Legal Issues:**
1. **Breach of Warranty:** The plaintiff claims that Kia Motors violated both express and implied warranties concerning the vehicle's performance and reliability.
2. **Consumer Protection Violations:** The plaintiff alleges that Kia Motors engaged in deceptive business practices by not disclosing known defects and failing to provide appropriate remedies.
3. **Product Liability:** The case may involve analyzing whether Kia Motors is liable for distributing a product that is unreasonably dangerous or defective.
**Arguments:**
- **For the Plaintiff (Mamikon Karapetian):** The plaintiff argues that Kia Motors was aware of the vehicle's defects before the sale and failed to rectify the issues or adequately inform the plaintiff. The plaintiff seeks damages for the cost of repairs, loss of use of the vehicle, and potential punitive damages for dishonest business practices.
- **For the Defendant (Kia Motors America, Inc.):** Kia Motors likely argues that they fulfilled their warranty obligations and that any defects were not known to them or were a result of misuse by the plaintiff. They may also contest the claims of consumer protection violations, asserting that their practices were compliant with the law.
**Outcome:**
[Insert outcome if case has been resolved, including any decisions made by the court or settlement agreements reached. If still pending, indicate that.]
**Significance:**
This case exemplifies issues surrounding consumer rights and manufacturer responsibilities in cases involving defective automotive products. It highlights the importance of warranties and the legal remedies available to consumers facing issues with purchased vehicles.
[Note: Specific details such as court name, date, and outcome are crucial for a complete case summary but were not provided in your request. Please fill in with accurate information as applicable.]