Legal Case Summary

Mandeville v. Onoda Cement Company


Date Argued: Thu May 15 2003
Case Number: 02-17045
Docket Number: 7861570
Judges:Hawkins, W.fletcher, King
Duration: 26 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Mandeville v. Onoda Cement Company, Docket No. 7861570** **Court:** [Relevant Court Name] **Date:** [Relevant Dates] **Judges:** [Names of Judges, if available] **Citation:** [Appropriate citation details if available] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Mandeville - **Defendant:** Onoda Cement Company **Background:** This case revolves around a dispute between Mandeville and Onoda Cement Company concerning [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., breach of contract, product liability, workplace injury, etc.]. The plaintiff, Mandeville, alleged that [state the main claims made by the plaintiff], which led to significant [describe the impact or damages suffered by the plaintiff]. **Facts:** 1. **Incident Description:** On [date], Mandeville engaged with Onoda Cement Company to [describe the transaction, agreement, or incident that triggered the dispute]. 2. **Claim Details:** Mandeville claimed that [provide specific details of the plaintiff's claims and any relevant contract or agreements]. 3. **Defendant's Position:** Onoda Cement Company responded by arguing that [summarize the defense's argument against the claims made by Mandeville]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues examined in this case include: - [List and summarize key legal issues, such as breach of contract, negligence, liability, damages, etc.] - [Discuss any relevant statutory or case law that was cited by both parties] **Court’s Findings:** The court analyzed the arguments presented by both parties, focusing on [summarize key arguments or evidence presented in court]. The judge [describe the judge's findings or decisions, including any evidentiary rulings or legal conclusions]. **Outcome:** The court ruled in favor of [plaintiff or defendant], concluding that [summarize the final judgment or any remedies awarded]. The decision underscored [discuss any important principle established by the ruling or its implications for future cases]. **Conclusion:** Mandeville v. Onoda Cement Company illustrates [summarize the broader implications of the case, including legal principles or industry impacts]. The ruling serves as a significant precedent in [mention relevant area of law or industry]. **Notes:** - Any appeal proceedings or further developments in the case should be noted if they occur after the initial ruling. **Disclaimer:** This summary is for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal advice or a substitute for professional legal counsel.

Mandeville v. Onoda Cement Company


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available