Legal Case Summary

Manuel Terenkian v. The Republic of Iraq


Date Argued: Tue Dec 06 2011
Case Number: 10-56708
Docket Number: 7840015
Judges:Noonan, Gould, Ikuta
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Manuel Terenkian v. The Republic of Iraq** **Docket Number:** 7840015 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Manuel Terenkian - **Defendant:** The Republic of Iraq **Background:** Manuel Terenkian, the plaintiff, initiated legal action against the Republic of Iraq, asserting claims related to [insert specific legal claims, e.g., breach of contract, wrongful detention, damages, etc.]. The case arises from events that took place on [insert relevant date or time period], which involved [briefly describe the circumstances leading to the case, e.g., interactions with government authorities, contracts, property disputes, etc.]. **Claims:** The plaintiff presented several claims including [list the main claims or allegations made by the plaintiff, detailing the nature of the grievances against the Republic of Iraq]. These claims were based on [explain the basis of the claims, e.g., violations of international law, contractual obligations, human rights violations, etc.]. **Response from the Republic of Iraq:** The Republic of Iraq responded to the allegations, arguing [summarize the defense's arguments, including any legal immunities, counterclaims, or dismissals put forth by the defendant]. The defense contended that [insert specific defenses or justifications provided by the Republic of Iraq]. **Legal Issues:** The key legal issues in the case revolve around [identify the central legal questions or disputes that the court had to address, such as jurisdiction, immunity, applicability of international law, etc.]. The case also raised questions relating to [additional legal principles or issues relevant to the case]. **Court's Findings and Conclusion:** After reviewing the evidence and arguments from both parties, the court found that [summarize the court's decision and rationale]. The ruling could have implications for [discuss any broader implications of the case, such as precedent for similar cases or impact on international relations]. **Outcome:** The court ruled in favor of [insert the name of the winning party], resulting in [describe the outcome, such as damages awarded, orders for actions, dismissals, etc.]. The ruling may also set important precedents regarding [mention any significant legal principles or impacts based on the case outcome]. **Next Steps:** Following the decision, [include any mention of potential appeals, ongoing legal actions, or future implications for both parties]. Please note that this summary is a hypothetical construct for illustrative purposes, as there may not be an actual case with the specified details. Adjust the details as necessary based on accurate case information if available.

Manuel Terenkian v. The Republic of Iraq


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available