Legal Case Summary

Marcelone Hughes v. United States


Date Argued: Wed Jul 09 2014
Case Number: 06-14-00015-CV
Docket Number: 2604383
Judges:Piersol, SMITH, CHRISTEN
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Marcelone Hughes v. United States (Docket No. 2604383)** **Court:** United States District Court **Date:** [Insert Date of Decision] **Docket Number:** 2604383 **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Marcelone Hughes - **Defendant:** United States of America **Background:** Marcelone Hughes brought a case against the United States, alleging [insert the nature of the claim, e.g., negligence, violation of civil rights, wrongful imprisonment, etc.]. The circumstances surrounding the case stemmed from [briefly outline the events that led to the legal action, including relevant dates and actions taken by both parties]. **Claims:** Hughes claimed that the United States [detail specific actions or inactions by the government that led to Hughes's claims]. The plaintiff contended that these actions resulted in [state the damages or impact on Hughes]. **Legal Issues:** The primary issues before the court included: 1. [Issue 1: describe the legal question, e.g., jurisdiction, applicability of law, etc.] 2. [Issue 2: another relevant legal question] 3. [Any additional issues] **Court's Analysis:** The court analyzed the claims presented by Hughes, referencing relevant statutes and legal precedents that pertained to the case. The court assessed the evidence provided by both parties and determined [summarize the court's reasoning and critical findings related to the case]. **Ruling:** The court ultimately ruled in favor of [either plaintiff or defendant]. The judgment established that [summarize the main points of the ruling, including any orders for damages, dismissals, or other legal consequences]. **Conclusion:** The case of Marcelone Hughes v. United States underscores [discuss any implications of the ruling or the significance of the case in the broader legal context]. The decision is important for [highlight potential impacts on future cases, public policy, or legal standards]. --- **Note:** Please insert specific details such as the nature of the claim, dates, and outcomes, which were not provided in your initial inquiry.

Marcelone Hughes v. United States


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available