Legal Case Summary

Marco Lopez v. Michael Stainer


Date Argued: Mon Sep 10 2012
Case Number: 09-17121
Docket Number: 7838945
Judges:Alarcon, Thomas, Berzon
Duration: 25 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Marco Lopez v. Michael Stainer** **Docket Number:** 7838945 **Court:** [Court Name, if known] **Date:** [Decision Date, if available] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Marco Lopez - **Defendant:** Michael Stainer **Background:** This case revolves around a legal dispute between Marco Lopez and Michael Stainer. The specifics of the case, including the underlying issue that necessitated legal action, were focused on [provide brief context of the dispute, such as breach of contract, personal injury, property dispute, etc.]. **Facts of the Case:** - Marco Lopez filed a complaint against Michael Stainer on [filing date]. - The core issue involved [details on the claims made by Lopez, including any relevant facts or events that led to the lawsuit]. - Michael Stainer responded to the allegations, providing [details regarding Stainer's defense and any counterclaims, if relevant]. - [Mention any pertinent evidence, testimonies, or expert opinions presented during proceedings]. **Legal Issues:** The case presented several legal issues for determination, including: 1. [Identify the key legal questions or points of law at stake in the case]. 2. [Any relevant statutes or legal precedents that were cited or that apply to this case]. **Court's Findings:** The court reviewed the evidence, considered the arguments from both parties, and issued findings based on the law and facts presented. Key findings included: - [Summarize the court’s primary conclusions supporting either Lopez's or Stainer's position]. - [Mention any determinations made regarding damages, liability, or other aspects relevant to the case outcome]. **Outcome:** The court’s decision resulted in [detail the final judgment, including any awarded damages, orders for relief, or other consequences for either party]. The ruling may have implications for [discuss any broader implications of the case, if applicable]. **Conclusion:** The case of Marco Lopez v. Michael Stainer illustrates [provide insights into the significance of the case, particularly how it contributes to legal precedents, impacts the involved parties, or relates to specific legal principles]. **Future Implications:** As a result of this judgment, both parties have the option to [describe any options for appeal or further legal action, if relevant]. The case highlights important aspects of [mention any relevant legal principles or areas of law that practitioners should pay attention to]. --- Note: Please adjust details for court name, decision date, and specific facts or conclusions as needed, as the provided case does not have sufficient existing information to provide a thorough summary.

Marco Lopez v. Michael Stainer


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available