Case Summary
**Case Summary: Mario De La Fuente Manriquez v. City of Phoenix, Docket Number 3078988**
**Court:** Arizona Court of Appeals
**Date:** [Insert relevant dates if available]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Appellant:** Mario De La Fuente Manriquez
- **Appellee:** City of Phoenix
**Background:**
The case involves Mario De La Fuente Manriquez challenging an action taken by the City of Phoenix. Specific details regarding the nature of the challenge or the underlying facts of the case would require further context but typically involve issues such as zoning, permits, civil rights, or municipal regulations.
**Legal Issues:**
The primary legal questions may encompass:
- The applicability of local ordinances or regulations.
- Whether the City of Phoenix violated any state or federal laws in its actions.
- Assessment of due process rights concerning municipal decision-making.
**Arguments:**
- **Appellant's Argument:** Mario De La Fuente Manriquez contends that the City of Phoenix acted unlawfully in the matter at hand, potentially arguing that his rights were infringed upon, or that the city failed to follow proper procedures or statutes.
- **Appellee's Argument:** The City of Phoenix defends its actions, likely asserting that its decisions were consistent with applicable laws and justified by public interest.
**Court’s Decision:**
The outcome of the case (e.g., whether the court sided with Manriquez, the City of Phoenix, or made a procedural ruling) would clarify the legal standing regarding the issues raised and could provide guidance for similar future cases.
**Conclusion:**
This case highlights the complex interaction between citizens and municipal governments, as well as the legal framework that governs such relationships. The implications of the court's ruling might extend beyond the parties involved, influencing municipal law and procedures in Phoenix and potentially other jurisdictions.
*Note: More specific details about the case's background, court findings, and legal precedents would be necessary to provide a comprehensive and accurate case summary.*