Case Summary
**Case Summary: Mark M. Zanecki, Estate of Richard M. Zanecki v. Health Alliance Plan of Detroit**
**Docket Number:** 4425865
**Court:** [Court Name, if known]
**Date:** [Filing Date or Hearing Date, if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiff:** Mark M. Zanecki, on behalf of the Estate of Richard M. Zanecki
- **Defendant:** Health Alliance Plan of Detroit
**Background:**
This case revolves around a dispute concerning the health care coverage and benefits provided to Richard M. Zanecki prior to his death. The plaintiff, Mark M. Zanecki, is representing the estate of the deceased, claiming that the Health Alliance Plan of Detroit (HAP) failed to provide the agreed-upon benefits or improperly denied coverage, resulting in financial harm and distress incurred by the decedent and his estate.
**Legal Issues:**
The plaintiff argues that the defendant violated contractual obligations pertaining to health care services and may have also breached fiduciary duties related to the management and provision of the insurance policy. Key issues likely involve the interpretation of the health plan contract, the adequacy of coverage, and possibly matters of negligence or bad faith in handling claims.
**Claims:**
The estate is seeking damages for the perceived negligence or improper actions of HAP, which may include:
- Reimbursement for medical expenses incurred
- Compensation for emotional distress
- Any statutory penalties related to improper claim handling
**Procedural Posture:**
The case was initiated with the filing of a complaint by Mark M. Zanecki, outlining the grievances against HAP. The defendant has responded with their defense, and the case may involve motions for summary judgment, discovery disputes, or settlement discussions.
**Current Status:**
As of the last update in the proceedings, details regarding upcoming hearings, possible motions filed, or settlement negotiations may be pending. The case is ongoing, and the court is expected to review evidence and legal arguments presented by both parties.
**Conclusion:**
The case of Mark M. Zanecki, Estate of Richard M. Zanecki v. Health Alliance Plan of Detroit raises significant issues regarding health insurance coverage and the responsibilities of health care plans. The outcome of this case may have implications not only for the parties involved but also for broader principles surrounding health care obligations and patient rights.
**Note:** Further details regarding specific court rulings, evidence presented, and final outcomes would be necessary for a more comprehensive overview.