Legal Case Summary

Mark Rome v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation


Date Argued: Tue Feb 02 2010
Case Number: 08-56688
Docket Number: 7848278
Judges:Kleinfeld, Wardlaw, Callahan
Duration: 36 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Mark Rome v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation** **Docket Number**: 7848278 **Court**: [Insert Court Name] **Filing Date**: [Insert Filing Date] **Parties Involved**: - **Plaintiff**: Mark Rome - **Defendant**: SmithKline Beecham Corporation **Background**: The case involves claims made by Mark Rome against SmithKline Beecham Corporation, a major pharmaceutical company. The specifics of the case hinge on allegations regarding [briefly outline the nature of the complaint, such as product liability, breach of contract, employment discrimination, etc.]. **Facts**: Mark Rome, the plaintiff, asserts that [summarize the key facts that led to the dispute, including any relevant dates, events, and actions taken by both the plaintiff and defendant]. SmithKline Beecham Corporation, in its defense, contends that [summarize the defendant’s position, including any counterclaims or defenses they might have put forward]. **Legal Issues**: The primary legal issues presented in this case include: 1. [List the main legal issues, such as negligence, breach of warranty, duty of care, etc.] 2. [Additional legal issues if applicable] **Court’s Analysis**: [If available, summarize the court's reasoning, any statutes or precedents cited, and how they apply to the case.] **Outcome**: The court ruled that [summarize the judgment or order issued by the court, including any compensatory or punitive damages awarded, or any specific actions required by either party]. The court's decision is significant because [explain any implications or the broader impact of the ruling, if applicable]. **Conclusion**: The case of Mark Rome v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation serves as an important example of [explain the relevance of the case in legal context, industry implications, or any other significant points]. **Note**: Further details regarding the specific legal principles involved, evidentiary challenges, or subsequent appeals can be added as they become available. [Insert any additional notes or information that might be relevant for complete context.] **End of Summary** *Note: Please insert specific court names, filing dates, factual details, and legal analyses as they relate to the case once you have that information, as the above is a template and will require specific data to be fully fleshed out.*

Mark Rome v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available