Case Summary
**Case Summary: Marlene Herrera v. Command Security Corp.**
**Docket Number:** 3047532
**Court:** [Specify Court if known, e.g., New York State Supreme Court, Appellate Division]
**Date:** [Specify date of the decision if known]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Marlene Herrera
- **Defendant:** Command Security Corp.
**Background:**
Marlene Herrera brought a case against Command Security Corp., alleging violations related to her employment with the company. The nature of the claims involved issues such as wrongful termination, discrimination, or failure to accommodate, relevant to employment law standards.
**Key Issues:**
1. Whether Command Security Corp. unlawfully terminated Herrera's employment.
2. The applicability of employee rights and protections under relevant labor laws.
3. Whether the defendant failed to follow proper procedural protocols regarding employment termination and employee treatment.
**Findings:**
The court examined evidence presented by both parties, including employment records, witness testimonies, and any relevant communications. The court's determination likely focused on:
- The validity of Herrera’s claims regarding her treatment at the workplace.
- Whether Command Security Corp. adhered to legal standards in handling employment-related actions.
- The assessment of damages and remedies potentially available to Herrera.
**Ruling:**
The court issued a ruling based on its findings, which resulted in either a dismissal of the case, a settlement, monetary compensation for Marlene Herrera, reinstatement, or other forms of relief appropriate to the circumstances of the case.
**Significance:**
This case may serve as a reference for similar employment disputes, particularly in addressing the rights of employees in the security industry, as well as ensuring that employers follow mandated protocols concerning employee treatment and termination.
**Conclusion:**
The case of Marlene Herrera v. Command Security Corp. underscores the ongoing challenges in employment law, particularly with respect to employee rights, corporate responsibility, and adherence to labor regulations.
(Note: This summary is a general framework and may require adaptation based on specific details and outcomes of the actual case.)