Marnika Lewis, Antoin Adams, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Greater Birmingham Ministries v. Governor of Alabama, In his official capacity as Governor of the State of Alabama, Attorney General, State of Alabama, In his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Date Argued: Fri Apr 13 2018
Case Number: 17-11009
Docket Number: 7807139
Judges:Not available
Duration: 42 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Case Summary
**Case Summary: Marnika Lewis, Antoin Adams, NAACP, Greater Birmingham Ministries v. Governor of Alabama, et al.**
**Docket Number:** 7807139
**Court:** [Court details if known]
**Date:** [Date if known]
**Parties Involved:**
- **Plaintiffs:** Marnika Lewis, Antoin Adams, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), Greater Birmingham Ministries
- **Defendants:** Governor of Alabama (in his official capacity), Attorney General of Alabama (in his official capacity)
**Overview:**
The case centers around a dispute involving voting rights and access to the electoral process in Alabama. The plaintiffs, which include individuals and organizations dedicated to the civil rights movement and community outreach, have challenged certain state laws and policies that they allege disproportionately affect minority voters and violate their rights under the Voting Rights Act and the Constitution.
**Key Issues:**
1. **Voting Access:** The plaintiffs contend that recent legislative measures enacted in Alabama create barriers to voting for minority populations, particularly impacting access to registration, polling places, and voting methods.
2. **Discrimination Claims:** The case raises issues of systemic racial discrimination in voting practices, as expressed by the plaintiffs' assertions that the state’s actions are in violation of both federal and state laws designed to protect voting rights.
3. **Constitutional Violations:** The plaintiffs argue that the state's policies violate the Equal Protection Clause and other constitutional provisions safeguarding the right to vote without discrimination.
**Arguments:**
- The plaintiffs argue that the measures in question are discriminatory in intent and effect, disproportionately impacting African American voters and other marginalized groups.
- The state, represented by the Governor and Attorney General, is likely to argue that the laws are enacted to ensure electoral integrity and do not violate any constitutional or statutory provisions.
**Implications:**
The outcome of this case may have significant implications for voting rights in Alabama, particularly for minority groups. A ruling in favor of the plaintiffs could lead to reforms in voting laws and policies, potentially impacting voter registration processes, accessibility of polling places, and overall electoral participation in the state.
**Status:**
[Details on the current status of the case, such as any recent rulings, hearings, or upcoming scheduled events if known.]
This summary provides a brief overview of the case, its context, and the central legal issues involved. Further developments should be monitored for updates on rulings and implications for voting rights.
Marnika Lewis, Antoin Adams, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Greater Birmingham Ministries v. Governor of Alabama, In his official capacity as Governor of the State of Alabama, Attorney General, State of Alabama, In his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Alabama