Legal Case Summary

Martha Koegel v. Eric H. Holder Jr.


Date Argued: Tue Jun 04 2013
Case Number: 08-74973
Docket Number: 7837668
Judges:Thomas, Silverman, Fisher
Duration: 20 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Martha Koegel v. Eric H. Holder Jr.** **Docket Number:** 7837668 **Court:** [Specify the court, e.g., U.S. District Court, Court of Appeals] **Date:** [Insert the relevant date of the decision] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Martha Koegel - **Defendant:** Eric H. Holder Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States **Background:** Martha Koegel filed a lawsuit against Eric H. Holder Jr., challenging certain actions taken by the Department of Justice which she claims adversely affected her rights. The case revolves around [briefly describe the nature of the dispute, e.g., an immigration issue, civil rights violation, employment matter, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** 1. [Identify the primary legal issues involved in the case, e.g., constitutional rights, statutory interpretation, administrative law.] 2. [Include any specific statutes or regulations that are at the center of the controversy.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Koegel argued that [summarize the plaintiff's claims and any legal basis for her argument. Mention any relevant facts that support her position]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** Holder contended that [summarize the defense's claims and basis for their position. Discuss any legal justifications or precedents cited by the defendant]. **Court’s Decision:** The court [describe the decision, e.g., ruled in favor of Koegel, dismissed the case, etc.]. The ruling emphasized [highlight key points from the court’s findings, discussing the interpretation of the law and relevant precedents]. **Outcome:** As a result of the ruling, [explain the implications of the decision, including any orders issued by the court, such as reinstatement, damages, or policy changes]. **Significance:** This case has implications for [discuss the broader significance of the ruling, including potential impact on similar cases, changes in legal precedent, or influence on public policy]. **Conclusion:** The decision in Martha Koegel v. Eric H. Holder Jr. underscores [summarize the main takeaway from the case, reiterating the importance of the legal principles involved and their application in this context]. --- *Note: This is a fictional case summary created for illustrative purposes based on the provided docket number. For accurate details, please refer to the actual court documents or legal filings.*

Martha Koegel v. Eric H. Holder Jr.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available