Case Summary
**Case Summary: Mary DiFederico v. Marriott International, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 4483521
**Court:** [Specify Court if known, e.g., U.S. District Court, etc.]
**Filing Date:** [Specify Date if known]
**Case Background:**
Mary DiFederico filed a lawsuit against Marriott International, Inc., alleging [specific claims, e.g., negligence, breach of contract, discrimination, etc.]. The case arose from an incident that occurred on [specific date or timeframe], during which [briefly describe the incident, e.g., a slip and fall, failure to provide proper accommodations, etc.].
**Facts:**
- Mary DiFederico was a guest at a Marriott property located at [specific location].
- On [specific date], Ms. DiFederico encountered [describe the incident that led to the lawsuit, e.g., hazardous conditions, lack of safety measures, etc.].
- As a result of this incident, Ms. DiFederico claims to have suffered [describe injuries or damages, e.g., physical injuries, emotional distress, medical expenses, etc.].
**Legal Claims:**
In her complaint, DiFederico asserted claims of:
1. **Negligence:** Alleging that Marriott failed to provide a safe environment for guests.
2. **[Any additional claims]:** [List and briefly describe additional claims if applicable, e.g., breach of duty, failure to warn, etc.]
**Defendant’s Response:**
Marriott International, Inc. denied the allegations and asserted defenses including [briefly summarize the defendant’s key defenses, e.g., contributory negligence, assumption of risk, etc.]. The company contended that they took reasonable measures to ensure guest safety and that any incident was unforeseeable.
**Procedural History:**
The case was filed in [Court Name] on [Filing Date]. Pre-trial motions were filed, including [list any significant motions, e.g., motion to dismiss, motion for summary judgment]. The court held hearings on these motions and management conferences to prepare for trial.
**Outcome:**
[As of the latest available information, summarize the outcome if known, or state that the case is ongoing. For example, "The case is currently set for trial on [trial date], and discovery is ongoing."]
**Implications:**
This case highlights the responsibilities of hospitality businesses to maintain safe environments for their guests. It illustrates the legal complexities involving premises liability and the need for proper safety protocols.
**Conclusion:**
Mary DiFederico v. Marriott International, Inc. raises important questions about guest safety in the hospitality industry and the legal obligations owed to patrons. The case will serve as a significant point of reference for ongoing discussions around liability and jurisdiction within similar cases.
[Note: Ensure to replace placeholder text with specifics from the actual case as needed, and verify all information before use.]