Case Summary
**Case Summary: Mary DiFederico v. Marriott International, Inc.**
**Docket Number:** 2603599
**Court:** Not specified
**Date:** Not specified
**Overview:**
The case of Mary DiFederico v. Marriott International, Inc. centers around claims made by the plaintiff, Mary DiFederico, against the corporation, Marriott International, alleging negligence resulting in personal injury.
**Facts:**
Mary DiFederico filed a lawsuit against Marriott International following an incident that occurred at one of Marriott's properties. DiFederico claims that due to the hotel's negligence—potentially involving maintenance issues or failure to provide proper safety measures—she suffered injuries. The specifics of the incident, including the location, nature of the injuries, and the circumstances leading to the accident, are critical to understanding the liability involved.
**Legal Issues:**
The central legal issue in this case revolves around the duty of care owed by Marriott to its guests. The plaintiff must establish that:
1. Marriott had a duty to provide a safe environment for its guests.
2. Marriott breached that duty through negligence.
3. As a direct result of that breach, DiFederico sustained injuries.
**Arguments:**
- **Plaintiff's Position:** DiFederico argues that Marriott failed to uphold its duty of care, resulting in her injuries. Evidence might include witness testimonies, photographs, maintenance records, and expert opinions on the standards of care expected in the hospitality industry.
- **Defendant's Position:** Marriott International may counter by asserting that they maintained all necessary safety protocols or that the incident was beyond their control. They could argue that DiFederico's injuries were due to her own negligence or that there was no actual breach of duty.
**Outcome:**
The resolution of the case would depend on the court's findings based on the evidence presented. Possible outcomes include a ruling in favor of DiFederico, which may entitle her to damages, or a ruling in favor of Marriott, where DiFederico's claims may be dismissed.
**Conclusion:**
The case highlights the important legal principles governing premises liability and the responsibilities of hospitality businesses to ensure the safety of their patrons. The final judgment will hinge on the facts presented and the application of law regarding negligence and duty of care.
(Note: Specific courtroom details, trial dates, and additional context, including relevant statutes and case law, were not provided in the initial request and may be essential for a complete analysis.)