Legal Case Summary

Mary Ganley v. County of San Mateo


Date Argued: Fri Oct 09 2009
Case Number: 08-15909
Docket Number: 7848918
Judges:Wallace, Thompson, Thomas
Duration: 24 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Mary Ganley v. County of San Mateo** **Docket Number: 7848918** **Court:** [Insert Court Name, if applicable] **Date:** [Insert Date] **Judge:** [Insert Judge's Name, if applicable] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Mary Ganley - **Defendant:** County of San Mateo **Background:** Mary Ganley initiated a lawsuit against the County of San Mateo alleging [provide brief details on the nature of the complaint, e.g., negligence, wrongful termination, discrimination, etc.]. The case arose from incidents that allegedly took place on [insert relevant dates or time frame], where the plaintiff claimed [summarize the key facts of the case]. **Claims:** Ganley’s claims included [list specific legal claims, such as violation of civil rights, breach of contract, etc.]. The plaintiff sought [describe the relief sought, e.g., monetary damages, injunctive relief, reinstatement, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues centered around [list the main legal issues, such as the applicability of statutes, determination of liability, defenses raised by the defendant, etc.]. **Defendant's Response:** The County of San Mateo responded by [briefly summarize the defense’s position, including any denials or affirmative defenses]. They argued that [insert the main points raised in the defense, including any legal justifications or procedural matters]. **Proceedings:** [Discuss any key proceedings that took place in the case, such as motions filed, hearings, or trial details. Include any significant rulings by the court.] **Outcome:** As of the last available update, the court ruled [summarize the outcome of the case—whether it was dismissed, decided in favor of the plaintiff, or the defendant, etc.]. The court provided reasoning based on [briefly summarize the reasoning given by the court, referencing any legal precedents or statutes]. **Significance:** This case underscores [discuss any broader implications the case may have for similar cases, legal precedents established, or impact on public policy]. **Conclusion:** The case of Mary Ganley v. County of San Mateo illustrates the complexities of [specific legal issue] and highlights the ongoing challenges individuals may face when seeking justice within the framework of governmental entities. **Note:** This summary is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For detailed legal interpretations and case law, consult a legal professional.

Mary Ganley v. County of San Mateo


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available