Legal Case Summary

Mary Johnson v. United States


Date Argued: Tue Sep 17 2013
Case Number: 14-20450
Docket Number: 2591501
Judges:J. Harvie Wilkinson III, Allyson K. Duncan, G. Steven Agee
Duration: 26 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Mary Johnson v. United States** **Docket Number:** 2591501 **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., United States District Court for the [District Name]] **Date:** [Specify Date of Decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Mary Johnson - **Defendant:** United States **Background:** Mary Johnson filed a lawsuit against the United States, alleging [briefly specify the nature of the claim, e.g., negligence, wrongful termination, breach of contract, etc.]. The case arose from events that occurred on [date or period of time] where [provide a brief overview of the circumstances leading to the lawsuit]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues presented in this case include: 1. [Issue 1: describe the first legal issue, e.g., Was there a breach of duty of care?] 2. [Issue 2: describe the second legal issue if applicable, e.g., Did the government have immunity?] 3. [Additional issues as applicable] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Arguments:** Mary Johnson contended that [summarize the arguments made by Mary Johnson, including any evidence or legal precedent she referenced to support her claims]. - **Defendant’s Arguments:** The United States argued that [summarize the defense's position, including any defenses raised, such as sovereign immunity or compliance with applicable laws]. **Ruling:** The [specify court] ruled in favor of [Plaintiff/Defendant] on [date of ruling]. The court [explain the decision, e.g., found in favor of the government due to sovereign immunity, awarded damages to the plaintiff, etc.]. The court reasoned that [provide a brief explanation of the rationale behind the court's decision]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Mary Johnson v. United States serves as significant in terms of [discuss implications of the ruling, any contributions to legal precedent, or potential effects on similar cases]. This decision underscores [mention any key takeaways about legal principles involved]. **Next Steps:** Following the ruling, [detail any next steps taken by the parties, such as appeals, further litigation, or settlement negotiations]. **[Optional Section: Dissenting Opinions or Concurrences, if applicable]** **Note:** Further details regarding the case may be accessible through court records or legal databases for those interested in the specific procedural history and documentation related to the case.

Mary Johnson v. United States


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available