Legal Case Summary

Matt Fredenburg v. Peter Prolo


Date Argued: Wed Dec 08 2010
Case Number: 09-16396
Docket Number: 7846589
Judges:Reinhardt, Hawkins, Smith N. R.
Duration: 33 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Matt Fredenburg v. Peter Prolo** **Docket Number:** 7846589 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Filing Date:** [Insert Date] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Matt Fredenburg - **Defendant:** Peter Prolo **Background:** The case of Matt Fredenburg v. Peter Prolo involves a legal dispute that arises from [provide a brief overview of the issue at hand, such as breach of contract, personal injury, property dispute, etc.]. The parties entered into a relationship involving [describe the nature of the relationship, whether commercial, personal, etc. that led to the conflict]. **Facts:** 1. **[Fact 1:]** [State a relevant fact that establishes the context of the dispute, such as timeline, events leading up to the case, and the actions of each party.] 2. **[Fact 2:]** [Include another pertinent fact regarding the claims or defenses put forth by either party.] 3. **[Fact 3:]** [Highlight any significant actions taken by either party that are crucial to understanding the case.] 4. **[Fact 4:]** [Mention any attempts at resolution or negotiation prior to the lawsuit, if applicable.] **Claims:** - **Plaintiff’s Claims:** Matt Fredenburg claims that [outline the specific legal claims made by the plaintiff against the defendant, including the relevant laws or codes that are cited.] - **Defendant’s Response:** Peter Prolo denies the allegations and counters by [summarize the key points of the defendant’s argument or any counterclaims made.] **Issues:** The primary legal issues for determination in this case include: 1. Whether [first issue, e.g., breach of contract occurred and the extent of damages]. 2. Whether [second issue, e.g., the defenses raised by the defendant are valid]. **Ruling:** [To be filled in once the court renders a decision. Include the ruling of the court and the reasoning behind it.] **Conclusion:** The case of Matt Fredenburg v. Peter Prolo is significant in exploring [discuss the implications of the case on the relevant area of law, any precedents set, or the potential impact on future cases]. Further developments or appeals may follow based on the court's decision. **Notes:** - [Any additional information or relevant notes about the case, such as related cases, public interest, or procedural history.] --- This summary is intended to provide a concise overview of the case and is based on available information. For specific details, including actual court documents, please refer to official court records.

Matt Fredenburg v. Peter Prolo


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available