Legal Case Summary

Matthew Hartley v. Craig Forte


Date Argued: Wed Apr 13 2016
Case Number: 14-15971
Docket Number: 3053787
Judges:Schroeder, Kozinski, Trott
Duration: 32 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Matthew Hartley v. Craig Forte** **Docket Number:** 3053787 **Court:** [Specify the court if known, e.g., Superior Court, Circuit Court] **Date:** [Specify the date of the decision if available] **Background:** In the case of Matthew Hartley v. Craig Forte, the plaintiff, Matthew Hartley, brought a legal action against the defendant, Craig Forte, alleging [specific allegations or claims made by the plaintiff, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. The dispute arose from [a brief background of the events leading to the lawsuit, e.g., a contractual agreement, an incident that led to injury, etc.]. **Facts:** - **Plaintiff's Claims:** Matthew Hartley asserts that [summarize the key facts of the plaintiff's claims, including any specific incidents, injuries, or damages suffered as a result of the defendant's actions]. - **Defendant's Response:** Craig Forte denies the allegations, claiming that [summarize the defense's arguments or counterclaims, including evidence or reasoning provided by the defendant]. - [Include any relevant evidence presented by either party, such as witness testimonies, documents, or expert opinions]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case include: 1. [List the legal issues, such as liability, breach of duty, damages, etc.] 2. [Any additional legal issues pertinent to the case]. **Court's Analysis:** The court examined the evidence presented by both parties and analyzed the applicable law concerning [mention relevant laws, statutes, or precedents]. The court evaluated [describe the court's reasoning regarding the plaintiff's claims and the defendant's defenses]. **Conclusion:** Ultimately, the court ruled [summarize the outcome of the case, including any judgments made, damages awarded, or dismissals]. The ruling addressed [discuss any significant implications of the ruling related to the parties involved or broader legal principles]. **Implications:** This case underscores [briefly discuss the implications of the case for similar future cases, legal standards established, or any changes to precedent that may result from this ruling]. **[Optional: Any additional remarks or future considerations.]** (Note: Specific details regarding the court's decision, key dates, and legal principles should be filled in based on actual case documentation.)

Matthew Hartley v. Craig Forte


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available