Legal Case Summary

Matthew Jenkins v. James Ward, Sr.


Date Argued: Tue Mar 24 2015
Case Number: 517417
Docket Number: 2644801
Judges:Diana Gribbon Motz, Barbara Milano Keenan, Stephanie D. Thacker
Duration: 45 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Matthew Jenkins v. James Ward, Sr.** **Docket Number:** 2644801 **Court:** [Specify Court Here, e.g., Superior Court of [State]] **Date:** [Specify Date of Ruling/Decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Matthew Jenkins - **Defendant:** James Ward, Sr. **Background:** This case involves a dispute between Matthew Jenkins and James Ward, Sr., arising from [briefly outline the nature of the dispute—e.g., a personal injury claim, breach of contract, property dispute, etc.]. The details of the event leading to this litigation occurred on [insert relevant date or timeline of events]. **Facts of the Case:** - The plaintiff, Matthew Jenkins, claims that [summarize the plaintiff's main arguments and allegations against the defendant]. - The defendant, James Ward, Sr., contests these claims by [outline the defendant's main arguments and defenses]. - Relevant evidence presented included [list any significant evidence, testimonies, or documents]. **Issues:** The primary legal issues before the court involved: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., whether the defendant was negligent] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., the extent of damages suffered by the plaintiff] 3. [Additional issues if applicable] **Ruling:** The court ruled in favor of [the plaintiff/defendant], concluding that [summarize the court's reasoning and outcome]. The court found that [detail any key rulings, legal standards applied, and implications of the decision]. **Implications:** This ruling clarifies [describe any legal precedents set or clarified, how it impacts future cases, or the nuances of the law in relation to this case]. The court awarded [specify any damages awarded, if applicable]. **Conclusion:** The case of Matthew Jenkins v. James Ward, Sr. highlights important aspects of [insert relevant legal concepts or issues]. The decision reached by the court underscores [any significant takeaways or legal principles established in this ruling]. **Note:** Further details, including the specific court's reasoning, may require access to the official court’s opinion or additional case files for a comprehensive understanding of legal implications and context.

Matthew Jenkins v. James Ward, Sr.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available