Legal Case Summary

Matthew Jennings v. D. Runnels


Date Argued: Wed Sep 12 2012
Case Number: 10-16432
Docket Number: 7838927
Judges:Alarcon, Graber, Berzon
Duration: 28 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Matthew Jennings v. D. Runnels** **Docket Number:** 7838927 **Court:** [Specific Court Name, e.g., United States District Court, etc.] **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date] **Judges:** [Insert Judges' Names] **Background:** Matthew Jennings filed a case against D. Runnels, alleging [insert brief details of the claims, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. The dispute arose from [briefly outline the circumstances surrounding the case, such as events leading to the lawsuit, parties involved, and key facts]. **Facts:** - **Parties Involved:** Matthew Jennings (Plaintiff), D. Runnels (Defendant) - **Key Events:** - [List relevant events, e.g., dates and actions taken by each party leading up to the lawsuit] - [Any relevant contracts, agreements, or actions taken that are central to the case] **Legal Issues:** The case raises several legal issues, including but not limited to: - [Insert major legal questions or points of contention that the court is tasked with addressing] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments (Jennings):** - [Summarize Jennings’ primary arguments and legal theories. What relief is sought?] - **Defendant's Arguments (Runnels):** - [Summarize Runnels’ defense, including any counterclaims or defenses raised] **Court's Analysis:** - [Briefly summarize the court's reasoning, the principles of law applied, and any relevant precedents referenced by the court in its decision-making process.] **Outcome:** - [Insert the judgment or ruling made by the court, including any awards for damages, costs, or other orders.] **Significance:** The case is significant because [insert why this case matters – implications for future cases, its impact on legal precedent, or relevance to particular areas of law]. **Conclusion:** This case illustrates [summarize key takeaways from the case, e.g., the interpretation of specific laws, the application of contractual standards, etc.]. The decision serves as a reminder of [insert any broader implications for individuals or entities in similar circumstances]. (Note: Please fill in the placeholders with specific details pertaining to the case as applicable, including the nature of the claims made, the ruling, and any additional context that may enhance the summary.)

Matthew Jennings v. D. Runnels


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available