Legal Case Summary

Matthew Sexton v. Mike Cozner


Date Argued: Tue May 08 2012
Case Number: 10-35055
Docket Number: 7839363
Judges:Tashima, Tallman, Ikuta
Duration: 31 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Matthew Sexton v. Mike Cozner** **Docket Number: 7839363** **Court**: [Insert Court Name] **Date Filed**: [Insert Filing Date] **Judge**: [Insert Judge's Name] **Parties Involved**: - **Plaintiff**: Matthew Sexton - **Defendant**: Mike Cozner **Background**: The case of Matthew Sexton v. Mike Cozner arises from a dispute between the plaintiff, Matthew Sexton, and the defendant, Mike Cozner. The nature of the case involves [insert brief description of the underlying issue, e.g., breach of contract, personal injury, property dispute, etc.]. **Facts**: 1. **Incident Description**: On [insert date of incident], an event occurred involving both parties that led to the present litigation. [Provide a concise description of the events that transpired, including relevant dates and actions taken by both parties]. 2. **Allegations**: Matthew Sexton alleges that [insert specific allegations made by the plaintiff against the defendant, highlighting key points of contention]. 3. **Defendant’s Response**: In response, Mike Cozner contends that [outline the defendant's arguments or defenses against the plaintiff's claims]. **Legal Issues**: The primary legal issues in this case center around [summarize the legal questions or statutes at play, such as liability, responsibility, damages, etc.]. **Arguments**: - **Plaintiff’s Arguments**: Sexton argues that [summarize the plaintiff's key legal arguments and any evidence presented to support his claims]. - **Defendant’s Arguments**: Cozner counters by asserting that [summarize the defendant's legal defenses and evidence]. **Court’s Decision**: The court ruling [insert decision made by the court, for example, whether the plaintiff's or defendant's position was upheld, any damages awarded, or if the case was dismissed]. **Conclusion**: This case illustrates [summarize the overarching legal principle or significance of the case]. As a result of the court's ruling, both parties must [briefly describe the outcome and any implications for the parties involved]. **Next Steps**: Following the judgment, the parties have the option to [outline any potential appeals or further legal actions that may take place]. Please note that specific details regarding the filing dates, court names, judge names, and the nature of the dispute should be included for contextual accuracy. If specific outcomes or rulings are known, they should also be incorporated into this summary.

Matthew Sexton v. Mike Cozner


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available