Legal Case Summary

Michael Demirdjian v. William Sullivan


Date Argued: Mon May 12 2014
Case Number: 09-56453
Docket Number: 7836270
Judges:Noonan, Wardlaw, Fisher
Duration: 30 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Michael Demirdjian v. William Sullivan** **Docket Number:** 7836270 **Court:** [Specify Court if known, e.g., Superior Court, Court of Appeals, etc.] **Date:** [Specify Date if known] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Michael Demirdjian - **Defendant:** William Sullivan **Background:** Michael Demirdjian filed a lawsuit against William Sullivan alleging [specify the nature of the claims, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, etc.]. The case arose from [briefly describe the circumstances that led to the dispute, such as an event or series of events that triggered the legal action]. **Facts:** 1. **Incident Occurrence:** [Briefly outline the key facts of the case, including dates, actions taken by parties involved, and any relevant events leading to the lawsuit]. 2. **Legal Claims:** Demirdjian claims that Sullivan [describe the actions or omissions by Sullivan that Demirdjian alleges are wrongful, including any relevant laws or regulations that support the claims]. 3. **Defendant’s Response:** Sullivan responded to the complaint by [summarize Sullivan's defense, any counterclaims made, or motions filed]. **Issues:** The primary legal issues in this case may include: - [List any key legal questions, such as liability, damages, or jurisdiction.] - [Any particular statutes or case law that may play a crucial role in the determination of the case.] **Court’s Findings:** [If applicable, provide a summary of court findings or rulings on motions, and any key judicial interpretations that were made as the case progressed.] **Outcome:** [Summarize the ultimate decision made by the court, including whether the plaintiff or defendant prevailed, any damages awarded, or other remedies provided.] **Significance:** [Discuss any broader implications of the case for the relevant field of law, future precedents, or impact on similar cases. This may also include mentions of public interest, if applicable.] **Conclusion:** The case of Michael Demirdjian v. William Sullivan highlights [summarize the overall importance of the case, lessons learned, or unresolved issues]. (Note: As specific details about the case were not provided, some elements in this summary have been left generic. It's essential to fill in or adjust details based on the actual information from the case records.)

Michael Demirdjian v. William Sullivan


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available