Legal Case Summary

Michael Ogden v. County of Maui


Date Argued: Fri May 15 2009
Case Number: 08-16317
Docket Number: 7850075
Judges:Kozinski, Bybee, Callahan
Duration: 22 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Michael Ogden v. County of Maui, Docket Number 7850075** **Court:** [Insert appropriate court name] **Date:** [Insert date of the decision or filing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Michael Ogden - **Defendant:** County of Maui **Background:** Michael Ogden filed a lawsuit against the County of Maui concerning [insert the specific issue or incident that led to the lawsuit, e.g., property disputes, civil rights claims, injuries sustained in a local government property, etc.]. The case emerged from events that took place on [insert relevant date or time frame], where Ogden alleged [insert specific allegations or claims made by the plaintiff]. **Issues:** The central issues in the case involved: 1. [Issue 1: e.g., negligence, violation of rights, failure to act] 2. [Issue 2: e.g., claims for damages, jurisdictional questions, statutory interpretations] 3. [Any additional issues that are relevant] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff’s Argument:** Michael Ogden, through his legal representation, argued that [insert key arguments made by the plaintiff, including relevant legal standards or facts that support his claims]. - **Defendant’s Argument:** The County of Maui countered by [insert the County's defenses, such as claims of immunity, lack of jurisdiction, or disputing the facts alleged by Ogden]. **Court’s Decision:** The court [insert whether the court ruled in favor of Michael Ogden or the County of Maui, and summarize the court’s reasoning behind its decision]. Key findings included [insert any important findings or legal standards cited by the court, such as precedents or statutory interpretations]. **Outcome:** The court [insert the final ruling—e.g., awarded damages to plaintiff, dismissed the case, granted a motion for summary judgment], and [mention any orders or directives, such as appeals or next steps in the case, if applicable]. **Significance:** This case highlights [insert implications of the case—impact on local government practices, civil rights issues, legal precedent, etc.]. It serves as a pertinent examination of [insert broader themes relevant to the case]. **Next Steps:** Further proceedings may involve [mention any upcoming hearings, potential appeals, or continued litigation]. **Conclusion:** The case of Michael Ogden v. County of Maui exemplifies the complexities often faced in disputes involving local government entities and raises important questions regarding [insert relevant legal or social issues]. (Note: Please ensure to fill in the placeholders with specific information from the case to provide a comprehensive summary. The actual details of the case may be necessary to complete this summary accurately.)

Michael Ogden v. County of Maui


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available