Legal Case Summary

Michael Racusin v. American Wagering


Date Argued: Fri Aug 15 2014
Case Number: 146440
Docket Number: 2599298
Judges:Ezra, McKEOWN, CLIFTON
Duration: 31 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Michael Racusin v. American Wagering** **Docket Number:** 2599298 **Court:** [Insert appropriate court, e.g., United States District Court] **Date:** [Insert date of decision or filing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Michael Racusin - **Defendant:** American Wagering **Background:** Michael Racusin filed a lawsuit against American Wagering, a corporation involved in the wagering industry. The specifics of the case involve claims related to [provide a brief context of the claims, e.g., breach of contract, personal injury, employment issues, etc.], resulting in significant impacts to Racusin's [financial status, health, employment, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues in this case included: - [Define main legal issues, e.g., whether there was a breach of contract, if the defendant acted negligently, etc.] - [Discuss any relevant statutes or regulations that may apply to the case] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Racusin argued that [summarize the key claims made by Racusin, including facts supporting his position]. - **Defendant's Argument:** American Wagering contended that [outline the defense's perspective, including any defenses raised, such as lack of liability, adherence to industry standards, etc.]. **Court Decision:** The court ruled in favor of [plaintiff/defendant], concluding that [summarize the court's findings, the rationale behind the decision, and any orders given]. The decision included considerations such as [any evidence presented, witness testimonies, prior case law cited]. **Impact:** This case potentially sets a precedent regarding [discuss any implications for future cases, industry standards, or practices related to the subject matter of the dispute]. It also highlights the importance of [key takeaways related to legal standards, business practices, or other relevant areas]. **Conclusion:** The decision in Michael Racusin v. American Wagering serves as a critical examination of [relevant legal or industry issues]. The case illustrates [summarize what the case conveys about the law or industry], contributing to ongoing legal discussions in [related field or topic]. --- (Note: Please fill in any placeholder sections with the relevant details as per actual case information or context to meet your requirements.)

Michael Racusin v. American Wagering


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available