Legal Case Summary

Mike Kreidler v. Danny Pixler


Date Argued: Mon Apr 09 2012
Case Number: 11-35095
Docket Number: 7839504
Judges:Hug, Tashima, Callahan
Duration: 42 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Mike Kreidler v. Danny Pixler** **Docket Number:** 7839504 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date:** [Insert Date] **Parties:** - **Plaintiff:** Mike Kreidler, [Insert Title/Position, e.g., Washington State Insurance Commissioner] - **Defendant:** Danny Pixler, [Insert Title/Position if applicable] **Background:** The case involves a dispute between Mike Kreidler, the Washington State Insurance Commissioner, and Danny Pixler. The specifics of the conflict pertain to [Insert Brief Description of the Dispute, e.g., regulatory compliance, insurance practices, etc.]. Kreidler's actions are grounded in his regulatory authority to oversee and ensure compliance within the insurance industry in Washington state. **Facts:** - Mike Kreidler initiated the case due to [Insert Relevant Facts, e.g., alleged violations of insurance regulations]. - The issue arose from [Briefly explain the events leading to the dispute]. - The plaintiff contends that the defendant [Detail the actions taken by Danny Pixler that prompted the legal action, such as non-compliance with laws, specific violations, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues at stake in this case revolve around: 1. The interpretation of [Insert Relevant Statutes/Regulations]. 2. The extent of the powers granted to the Insurance Commissioner. 3. Potential defenses raised by Danny Pixler regarding [Insert any legal arguments or defenses raised]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Kreidler argues that [Summarize the plaintiff’s position and the relief sought, such as enforcement of regulations, penalties, injunctions, etc.]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Pixler's defense includes [Summarize the defendant's position, counterarguments, and any requests for dismissal or lack of merit]. **Outcome:** The case [Insert Outcome, e.g., is ongoing, has been resolved through a ruling, settlement, etc.]. [If a decision was made, summarize the court's ruling and its implications for both parties and the wider regulatory landscape]. **Significance:** This case holds importance for [Explain the broader implications of the case, such as its impact on regulatory practices, the insurance industry, or public policy]. **Next Steps:** - [Insert any upcoming court dates or actions the parties intend to take, if applicable.] --- *Note: The details and placeholders must be filled in with accurate information about the case where available.*

Mike Kreidler v. Danny Pixler


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available