Legal Case Summary

Mikhael Dorise v. Mantevousian


Date Argued: Wed May 17 2017
Case Number: 16-15822
Docket Number: 6063073
Judges:Thomas, Murguia, McCalla
Duration: 19 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Mikhael Dorise v. Mantevousian, Docket Number 6063073** **Court:** [Specify Court, e.g., Superior Court, [State]] **Date:** [Specify Date of Ruling or Filing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Mikhael Dorise - **Defendant:** Mantevousian **Case Overview:** Mikhael Dorise filed a lawsuit against Mantevousian concerning [briefly summarize nature of the case, e.g., breach of contract, personal injury, etc.]. The dispute arose from [provides context or background for the case, including relevant incidents or agreements that led to the lawsuit]. **Facts of the Case:** 1. **Background:** [Provide a brief background of the relationship between the parties or pertinent facts leading to the dispute.] 2. **Claims:** Dorise alleges that Mantevousian [summarize the specific claims made by the plaintiff, including relevant details about the alleged actions or omissions of the defendant that are claimed to be unlawful]. 3. **Defense:** Mantevousian [summarize the defense or counterclaims articulated by the defendant, including any justifications or explanations for the disputed actions]. **Legal Issues:** - The main legal questions before the court include [list and explain the primary legal issues that the court needed to resolve, such as interpretation of a contract, application of specific laws, etc.]. **Court’s Decision:** - The court ruled [summarize the court's ruling or decision, including whether the plaintiff's claims were upheld or dismissed and any specific legal findings or precedents that were cited]. **Outcome:** - The court [detail any remedies granted, orders issued, or damages awarded, and state whether the decision can be appealed]. **Significance:** This case highlights [discuss the broader implications of the case in terms of legal precedent, potential impacts on similar future cases, or societal issues it addresses]. **Conclusion:** Mikhael Dorise v. Mantevousian reinforces [summarize any concluding thoughts on the case's impact or importance]. Further appeals or motions [if applicable, mention any follow-up actions taken post-decision]. (Note: Specific details like court name, dates, and legal outcomes need to be filled in as appropriate based on actual case records.)

Mikhael Dorise v. Mantevousian


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available