Legal Case Summary

Mirko Carrea v. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.


Date Argued: Wed Jan 18 2012
Case Number: 11-15263
Docket Number: 7839841
Judges:Kozinski, Wardlaw, Paez
Duration: 34 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Mirko Carrea v. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.** **Docket Number:** 7839841 **Court:** [Specify Court] **Date:** [Specify Date] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Mirko Carrea - **Defendant:** Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc. **Background:** Mirko Carrea filed a lawsuit against Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc. alleging [specific claims, e.g., breach of contract, negligence, product liability, etc.]. The plaintiff claims to have suffered [specific damages, injuries, or losses] due to the actions or inactions of the defendant. **Factual Allegations:** - Carrea contends that [detail the core facts of the case, such as incidents that led to the lawsuit, the nature of the product involved, the circumstances surrounding the claim, etc.]. - Specific allegations may include [examples of how Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream may have violated regulations, failed to ensure product safety, misrepresented product quality, etc.]. **Legal Issues:** The case presents several legal questions, including: 1. Whether Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream is liable for [specify issue, e.g., breach of duty, misleading practices]. 2. The extent of damages incurred by Carrea and whether they can be directly attributed to the actions of Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Carrea argues that the defendant failed to meet certain standards of care, which directly led to the damages he suffered. Evidence presented may include [witness statements, expert testimony, product inspection results]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream may counter by asserting [defenses, such as lack of negligence, product compliance with safety standards, etc.], and potentially challenge the causation between their actions and the plaintiff's alleged injuries. **Ruling/Outcome:** [Specify if there has been a ruling or if the case is ongoing. If resolved, include the decision, any awarded damages, and implications of the ruling.] **Significance:** This case is significant as it addresses issues surrounding [mention important legal principles or public interests involved, e.g., consumer safety, corporate responsibility]. The outcome may affect [insert potential implications for businesses, consumers, regulatory standards]. **Next Steps:** [Include any forthcoming court dates, appeals, or anticipated further legal proceedings.] --- *Note: This summary is formulated based on a general template for case summaries and should be tailored to reflect specific details of the actual case as available.*

Mirko Carrea v. Dreyer's Grand Ice Cream, Inc.


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available