Legal Case Summary

Mohamed Al-Saffy v. Thomas Vilsack


Date Argued: Mon Jan 11 2016
Case Number: 06-50580
Docket Number: 3027164
Judges:Tatel, Millett, Edwards
Duration: 27 minutes
Court Name: D.C Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Mohamed Al-Saffy v. Thomas Vilsack** **Docket Number:** 3027164 **Court:** [Insert Court Name Here] **Filing Date:** [Insert Filing Date Here] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Mohamed Al-Saffy - **Defendant:** Thomas Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture **Background:** The case of Mohamed Al-Saffy v. Thomas Vilsack involves issues related to [insert general legal issues, e.g., administrative decisions, agency actions, employment matters within the Department of Agriculture, etc.]. The plaintiff, Mohamed Al-Saffy, claims that [briefly describe the claims made by Al-Saffy against Vilsack]. **Facts:** - Mohamed Al-Saffy is [provide a brief background of the plaintiff, e.g., occupation, relationship to the Department of Agriculture]. - Thomas Vilsack, as Secretary of Agriculture, is responsible for overseeing the policies and actions of the Department of Agriculture. - [Summarize the factual background leading to the case, such as specific incidents, interactions, or decisions made by Vilsack or the Department related to Al-Saffy]. **Legal Issues:** The central legal issues presented in this case include: 1. [First legal issue, e.g., whether the actions taken against Al-Saffy were lawful or unjustifiable]. 2. [Second legal issue, if applicable]. 3. [Any additional issues of significance]. **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Argument:** Al-Saffy argues that [summarize the key points of the plaintiff’s arguments, such as claims of discrimination, violation of rights, etc.]. - **Defendant's Argument:** Vilsack counters that [summarize the defendant’s key arguments and defenses]. **Decision:** [Insert information on the court's ruling if available. This may include judgments, orders, or dismissals related to the case.* **Significance:** The outcome of this case is significant because [explain the implications of the case, such as its impact on federal agency operations, employee rights, or administrative law]. **Conclusion:** This case serves as an important illustration of [mention broader themes such as government accountability, employment law within federal agencies, or the regulatory powers of the Secretary of Agriculture]. [Note: Be sure to fill in any placeholders with specific details concerning the court, dates, and decisions to complete the summary.]

Mohamed Al-Saffy v. Thomas Vilsack


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available