Legal Case Summary

Monica Navarro Pimentel v. Susan Dreyfus


Date Argued: Mon Aug 29 2011
Case Number: 11-35237
Docket Number: 7845179
Judges:Hawkins, McKeown, Bea
Duration: 39 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Monica Navarro Pimentel v. Susan Dreyfus** **Docket Number:** 7845179 **Court:** [Court Name] **Date:** [Date of Filing/Decision] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Monica Navarro Pimentel - **Defendant:** Susan Dreyfus **Background:** Monica Navarro Pimentel filed a lawsuit against Susan Dreyfus, raising legal issues that involve [briefly outline the nature of the dispute, e.g., employment, contractual obligations, personal injury, etc.]. The case may have arisen from specific incidents or ongoing interactions between the parties that necessitated judicial intervention. **Facts:** 1. **Incident/Events Leading to the Case:** Describe the sequence of events that led to the conflict, including any relevant dates, locations, and circumstances. 2. **Claims and Allegations:** Summarize the claims made by Monica Navarro Pimentel against Susan Dreyfus, detailing the basis for the lawsuit. 3. **Defense:** Outline any defenses presented by Susan Dreyfus in response to the claims made by the plaintiff. **Legal Issues:** Identify the primary legal issues presented in this case, such as: - [Legal issue 1: e.g., breach of contract] - [Legal issue 2: e.g., negligence, discrimination, etc.] **Court's Findings:** Summarize the key findings of the court, including: - [Finding 1: e.g., whether the plaintiff provided sufficient evidence to support her claims] - [Finding 2: e.g., conclusions on the defendant's liability, if any] **Outcome:** Detail the final decision made by the court, including: - Any rulings in favor of Monica Navarro Pimentel or Susan Dreyfus. - [Relief awarded, if applicable: e.g., damages, injunctions, etc.] **Significance:** Discuss the implications of the case's outcome: - How it affects the parties involved. - Its potential impact on similar cases or legal precedents. **Conclusion:** Conclude by reiterating the importance of this case in the broader context of [relevant field or area of law]. **Note:** The above summary serves as a hypothetical template. Actual case details, including specific claims, defenses, findings, and legal implications, would need to be filled in based on the actual court record and rulings.

Monica Navarro Pimentel v. Susan Dreyfus


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available