Legal Case Summary

Monica Quintana v. City of Alexandria


Date Argued: Wed May 10 2017
Case Number: 16-1630
Docket Number: 6060869
Judges:Roger L. Gregory, Dennis W. Shedd, James A. Wynn, Jr.
Duration: 42 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Monica Quintana v. City of Alexandria** **Docket Number:** 6060869 **Court:** [Insert Court Name] **Date of Filing:** [Insert Date] **Judge:** [Insert Judge Name] **Status:** [Insert Current Status, e.g., Pending, Resolved] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Monica Quintana - **Defendant:** City of Alexandria **Background:** Monica Quintana filed a lawsuit against the City of Alexandria, alleging [briefly summarize the claims made by Ms. Quintana, e.g., wrongful termination, discrimination, personal injury, etc.]. The case arises from events that occurred on [specific date or timeframe] where Quintana contends that the actions of the City of Alexandria [describe the nature of the actions, such as violations of rights, negligence, etc.]. **Allegations:** The allegations presented by Ms. Quintana include [list specific allegations, e.g., failure to follow proper procedures, discriminatory practices based on protected characteristics, etc.]. She claims that these actions have resulted in [mention the effects of the alleged actions on the plaintiff, such as emotional distress, financial loss, etc.]. **Legal Claims:** Monica Quintana's legal claims include: 1. [Allegation 1, e.g., violation of a specific law or statute] 2. [Allegation 2, e.g., negligence, breach of duty] 3. [Any additional claims] **Defendant's Response:** The City of Alexandria has [describe the City's response to the allegations, such as denying the claims, filing a motion to dismiss, etc.]. The defense argues that [summarize the key points made by the City, such as legal justifications, lack of merit in claims, etc.]. **Current Status:** As of [insert date], the case is [insert current status of the case, e.g., scheduled for a hearing, awaiting a ruling on a motion, etc.]. The court is expected to [insert any expected future actions, rulings, or schedules]. **Conclusion:** The outcome of Monica Quintana v. City of Alexandria could potentially set precedents regarding [mention any broader implications related to the case, such as employment law, civil rights, etc.]. The case remains under judicial consideration as the parties prepare for the next steps in the legal process. [Note: Specific details regarding dates, claims, and other parties involved should be inserted as appropriate based on the actual case documentation and factual context.]

Monica Quintana v. City of Alexandria


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available