Legal Case Summary

MORRIS v. GIURBINO


Date Argued: Thu Dec 08 2005
Case Number: 04-56359
Docket Number: 7857102
Judges:Pregerson, Cowen, Thomas
Duration: 47 minutes
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Case Summary

**Case Summary: Morris v. Giurbino** **Docket Number:** 7857102 **Court:** [Specify the Court if available, e.g., United States District Court] **Date:** [Include the date of the decision or filing] **Parties Involved:** - **Plaintiff:** Morris (the individual bringing the case) - **Defendant:** Giurbino (the individual/entity being sued) **Overview:** This case involves a legal dispute between Morris and Giurbino. The specifics of the case revolve around [insert the main issues in contention, such as a personal injury claim, breach of contract, wrongful termination, etc.]. The plaintiff, Morris, alleges that [briefly describe the plaintiff's claims and allegations]. In contrast, Giurbino contends that [summarize the defendant's position or defenses]. **Key Facts:** 1. [Fact 1: Include relevant facts that led to the dispute.] 2. [Fact 2: Outline any critical evidence or events that are pivotal to the case.] 3. [Fact 3: Mention any relevant timelines or actions taken by either party.] **Legal Issues:** The primary legal issues at stake in this case include: - [Issue 1: Describe the legal question or issue the court needs to resolve.] - [Issue 2: Mention any applicable laws or statutes involved.] **Arguments:** - **Plaintiff's Arguments:** Morris argues that [detail the main arguments presented by the plaintiff, including any evidence supporting those claims]. - **Defendant's Arguments:** Giurbino asserts that [outline the defenses or counterarguments put forward by the defendant]. **Court's Analysis:** The court reviewed the arguments and evidence presented by both parties. It assessed [mention any specific legal standards or precedents considered by the court] and evaluated how they applied to the facts of the case. **Outcome:** The court ruled in favor of [Morris/Giurbino], deciding that [summarize the decision and rationale of the court]. The ruling had implications for [discuss any broader legal or societal implications, if relevant]. **Conclusion:** The case of Morris v. Giurbino serves as a significant example of [state the broader importance or impact of the ruling, such as its contribution to legal precedent or clarification of a law]. **Note:** For a detailed understanding of the decision, including how the court addressed the specific legal issues, it is advisable to review the full court opinion.

MORRIS v. GIURBINO


Oral Audio Transcript(Beta version)

no audio transcript available