Case Summary
**Case Summary: Muhammad Abdurrahman v. Mark Dayton**
**Docket Number:** 6304142
**Court:** [Specify court, e.g., U.S. District Court, State Court, etc.]
**Date Filed:** [Specify date]
**Parties:**
- **Plaintiff:** Muhammad Abdurrahman
- **Defendant:** Mark Dayton (Governor of Minnesota)
**Background:**
Muhammad Abdurrahman filed a lawsuit against Mark Dayton, challenging certain actions or policies implemented during Dayton's tenure as Governor. The specifics of the case revolve around alleged violations of Abdurrahman's rights, which may include affirmative action issues, discrimination, or other grievances tied to government action.
**Key Issues:**
1. **Constitutional Claims:** The plaintiff alleges that certain state policies under Dayton’s administration violated constitutional rights, potentially including due process and equal protection clauses.
2. **Policy Challenge:** The lawsuit raises questions regarding the legality and fairness of specific state actions or regulations affecting Abdurrahman.
3. **Relief Sought:** The plaintiff seeks either monetary damages, injunctive relief, or a declaratory judgment to address the alleged wrongs.
**Procedural History:**
- The case was initiated in [specify initial court].
- Key motions may have included a motion to dismiss by the defendant or a request for summary judgment.
**Outcome:**
[Detail any rulings, dismissals, or settlements reached in the case. This may include trial dates, verdicts, or any appeals filed.]
**Significance:**
This case highlights issues of individual rights in relation to state governance and the broader implications of state policy on minority groups or individuals alleging discrimination.
---
Note: This case summary is a generic outline. Specific details such as dates, court, and outcome should be filled in with actual data relevant to the case Muhammad Abdurrahman v. Mark Dayton, if known.